quote:
Originally posted by VaRHPmom:
They might say that a lot of schools are attending, but then they send a coach who really doesn't have a say in the recruiting process (something I learned on HSBBW).
When VaRHPmom posted this the other day, I didn't have time to respond; but, I do now.
As VaRHPmom's parenthetical comment suggests, this notion of the "right coach" not attending showcases pops up from time-to-time. As I've had an opportunity to view the recruiting process more from the assistant coach's perspective the last couple of years, I thought I might share some thoughts about this (Please note that this is a Division I perspective.).
First of all, some context: At the Division I level, the NCAA allows only 3 coaches to be paid from the same university-based funding source. The third assistant (often referred to as the "volunteer assistant") has to be paid from other sources. In most cases, camp proceeds provide the lion's share of this assistant's compensation. ("Volunteer" is a misnomer. NO ONE works that hard for no compensation.)
Related to this, the NCAA only allows 3 coaches to travel to recruit. In most programs, those 3 would be the head coach and 2 assistants paid by the university. The third assistant, therefore, must confine his recruiting to on-campus visits and permitted types of communications. However, a third assistant can travel to instruct at a camp.
Knowing this leads to a couple of observations/conclusions:
(1) Virtually all coaches who attend showcases have a meaningful role in determining who is or is not considered a "recruit." They have traveled there on a tight budget to make a first-hand evaluation of the players present. They return with what they have observed and heard; and their input is vitally important.
(2) Camps that hire a number of college assistants to instruct may involve third assistants; and, sometimes, their voice may not be as influential in the determination process as the other 3 coaches. However, you should not assume that to be the case; as it is not unusual for a Head Coach to give his third assistant a full seat at the recruiting table for the purpose of discussing recruits.
Bottom line: The coach observing you almost always has an important voice in determining whether or not you're considered a "recruit."