Skip to main content

Many programs can lay claim to having successful programs churning out top college players, and the teams successful results. Undoubtedly these programs also produce a decent number of kids who take the next step and are at least drafted.

I suspect however there are programs that monitor/oversee every aspect of the players development just like some elite football programs do. That would include top notch workout facilities, and the right amount of elite staff to oversee the program. Some have nutritionists that custom make diets for players, and trainers who push the kids to the max during conditioning. Tutors to help keep the kids eligible, etc.
Obviously the college needs the financial resources to do such things, but I know of several programs that have a ton of $$$ but do not seem to use it like other programs do. For instance if you have the money to hire a crew to do the field maintanace instead of the team after practice/games, that frees up the players to use that time to do more of the aforementioned.

So which programs(D1-3 and/or JUCO) are going above and beyond in the area of baseball player development compared with other programs?

--- It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat. Theodore Roosevelt - April 23, 1910

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I think it's important to keep in mind that the vast majority of the college baseball programs lose money for their athletic departments; so, it stands to reason that most programs are going to try to save money and live within their budgets.

The ancillary services you describe are generally available where the football and basketball programs make enough profit that they fund resources sufficient to spill over to and benefit the "non-revenue" sports.

What you seek is available at the consistently successful programs in the major conferences, and not necessarily available at the less successful programs in those same conferences.
Last edited by Prepster
From what I have seen, this is pretty standard at most, if not all, ACC and SEC schools. When our son was coming along we paid special attention to which schools went the "extra mile" in terms of academic support, mandatory study hall, tutors, etc. We didn't visit a lot of big schools, but the ones we did were all on board. The mid majors were trying, but obviously didn't the money to do everything they would like to do.

quote:
Originally posted by Truman:
My son, also in a Pac 12 program (different from justbaseball's sons), also does all of that.

It seems to me one would be more likely to find that kind of thing in the top most competitive conferences. . .huh???
quote:
Originally posted by Prepster:
I think it's important to keep in mind that the vast majority of the college baseball programs lose money for their athletic departments; so, it stands to reason that most programs are going to try to save money and live within their budgets.

The ancillary services you describe are generally available where the football and basketball programs make enough profit that they fund resources sufficient to spill over to and benefit the "non-revenue" sports.

What you seek is available at the consistently successful programs in the major conferences, and not necessarily available at the less successful programs in those same conferences.


Prepster is spot on.

Why do you suppose that some programs are leaving their conferences to go to the more successful ones? Football and basketball. The more successful conferences in those sports means more money. More money means better facilities. Better facilities means better recruiting, and more wins for all of their sports.
Last edited by TPM
fOR THOSE OF YOU IN THE pAC-12, WE VISITED ONE of the school out there that said they had all the above and more. Of course it was private and very expensive to attend.

As to your experience MTH, we visited in few in the ACC, and it did not seem as structured from what they told us, especially in the nutrition area. He was not recruited by the football powerhouse teams so maybe that had something to do with not seeing it in the east. It is strange how a Florida kid got more interest out west than he did locally. Then again we did travel out there for a couple of showcases.

With the limited replies so far, it would seem as if it is more common on the west coast based on our forum members experiences.
Last edited by Vector
quote:
With the limited replies so far, it would seem as if it is more common on the west coast based on our forum members experiences.

_________

I don't think you could assume this. I know the 2 ACC and 2 SEC schools son visited certainly had it all in place. As there are consistent top programs within those conferences it would be a reach that the fine details aren't as important in the east as the west. My belief is that good programs exist everywhere in order to stay competitive.
quote:
Originally posted by smalltownmom:

I don't think you could assume this. I know the 2 ACC and 2 SEC schools son visited certainly had it all in place. As there are consistent top programs within those conferences it would be a reach that the fine details aren't as important in the east as the west. My belief is that good programs exist everywhere in order to stay competitive.


I don't disagree with you, just making an unscientific observation based on the few posts at this point. Yet it is funny how our visits to the west coast seemed to have that feel more than east coast teams. Then again, the sampling was so small it is really hard to say.
Last edited by Vector
I agree with you on the nutrition issue. I guess I sort of overlooked that part of your original post because our big issue was academic support. Son's school did not have a nutritionist routinely work with guys, but I believe there was one available if the kid wanted to talk to one. What they did do was make a daily recommendation regarding which of the on campus cafeterias had the most appropriate menu.

quote:
Originally posted by Vector:
As to your experience MTH, we visited in few in the ACC, and it did not seem as structured from what they told us, especially in the nutrition area.
I am not sure many programs have a nutritionist on site available to all students but maybe in their food services? They may tell you that. In our experience the nutritionist usually was the trainer. Roll Eyes

Ask to go to the cafeteria, some programs (especailly the powerhouse SEC football programs) have seperate areas for the athletes to eat. Their "training" tables are color coordinated, and the athletes are given guides as to eating properly and getting in all the food group during their training and playing periods. This might be what is considered programs with nutritionists.

Some programs feed their bb players before as well as after a game. The better the program, the better and more nutritional the meals. Kind of like the levels in pro ball, the higher up you go the better the menu. Smile

I am sure that all conferences have differences among their programs facilities especially the smaller private schools. Even though they charge hefty amounts for tuition, that doesn't mean that they have the best facilites available no matter what they tell you.

Unless someone has visited every program in every conference you cannot draw the conclusions you are trying to.
Last edited by TPM

Add Reply

Post
.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×