What is gained by watching 22 committed players? Maybe a player on the opposing team gets a little exposure?
Can someone give an opinion on how a player would get a chance to get a look if he is not a pitcher, possibly a catcher or driving balls to the fence? Routine plays, "automatics" do not stand out. Boys may play several games before they are even involved in a defensive play. Many mental errors still at this age, and physical errors are part of the game.
Then, you should "let the coaches/scouts do their job" was mentioned on another thread. If you promote yourself to a coach/program through direct contact/email does that help or hurt?
Have heard so many "differing" thoughts on the entire process. How does a young man know which direction to choose or what is accurate? Never mind the parent who should remain in the shadows?
What if The parents have only one college type athlete, or only one kid. The your learning curve is OJT. Lots of mistakes from lack of experience, too mich kool-aide.
Every kid cannot be on a top 20 travel team/program. Many teams have 2016, 2017 on the rosters. Most travel programs promote themselves as developmental, exposure at bigger tournies, etc.......but there were 305 teams at 17u. 1/2 probably played under 500 ball, or worse.
Some of the comments I personally have overheard this particular summer. Comments were just while eaves dropping
"that kid is going to be good when he fills out"
"I am just here to look at one kid"
"we will keep an eye on him"
"let's see where he is next year"
"I have seen this kid before, do you know if he is hurt"
"I saw him last xxxxxx his velo is down"
"I like his body, delivery, hands, etc but let's see what happens by next summer"
"I am watching a kid that expressed interest in us and has the academics that we like" (that was from an Ivy League coach/scout)
"I was watching this team warm up and how nonchalant the boys are warming up"
Hind sight is 20/20, to be forewarned is to be forearmed, do not trust your fate to chance..........