Skip to main content

However you come down on the issue of was the batter rung up or not, and was the ball in the dirt or not, Mike Scioscia handled the post-game interview with true class, saying that it was their fault for not playing better and putting themselves in a position where a close call could beat them. He refused to blame the loss on that call, despite every other reporter's questions trying to get him to do just that.

Two things compounded California's problem: the reliever did a horrible job holding the runner, basically inviting him to take second (and has anyone else noticed how many supposedly top closers ignore runners and let them steal at will?), which he did, followed by a good piece of hitting.


If the reliever does his job better, second base isn't stolen, and you have second and third with no outs, not a great situation, but better than "game over".
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I agree, he should have done a better job holding the runner. The catcher bobbled the ball in his glove and couldn't make a throw, but I doubt he would have had him anyway with the jump the runner was able to get. In that situation, you have to hold the runner to keep him from scoring position.

What I didn't understand was why the catcher didn't simply tag the batter. IMO it is good practice to tag the batter on anything close. Most catchers do. Last night was a great example for young catchers to learn from. Just do it.

As far as Mike Scioscia is concerned, he handled it better than many managers would have. Down playing it will hopefully allow the players to stay focused on the next game and let that one go. This is the kind of thing that could turn a series if it gets in their heads. I'm glad they're heading home and not the other way around. JMO.
Last edited by Callaway
Scioscia was a class guy when he played and still is.

As for the catcher not tagging the batter I think he was so convinced it was an out he just proceeded as he did.

Did you see Cold Pizza this morning? Woody and Skip really went at it about the play--was fun to watch


As for holding the runner there used to be a guy on the Mets with the worst talent for holding a runner on first--Dwight Gooden--coaching staff said they didnt want to work on it because they didn't want to ruin his pitching rhythm--same can be said for relievers--many just think outs at the plate not outs on the bases

Personally I just ask the pitcher to "step off"--no need to throw to keep him close--just "step off"
Scioscia is one of the very best.

He is a class act...to the max.

Having stated that, it continues to amaze me that he was not taken to tax for the following:

1) freezing his pitcher during a 10 minute argument. Once he knew the play WOULD NOT be overturned he should have hustled back to the dugout and let Escobar continue his domination of the Sox lineup. Instead, the frozen Escobar hung a splitty in the middle of the zone.

2) He is THE MASTER at calling pitch outs. In this most obvious steal situation he was too angry to think straight, imo. Also imo, (and I was behind the Sox dugout) Ozuna would not have scored from first base.
Last edited by soxnole

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×