quote:"I don't care how one calls it, but that is bad coaching and I will tell my son and others all day long why it was a poor coaching decision."
quote:The problem I have is the coach doesn't think it is or was his fault. I disagree- bad coaching and I will teach my son and others all day long what we can learn from that situation.
GBM, to read these comments and now learn you are an assistant coach questioning and throwing the baseball decisions of the HC under the bus with your son, his teammates and "others all day long" makes this worse in my mind, not better.
To learn you are the assistant coach throwing the #3 hitter in the order under the bus, and the HC coaching decision to place him in that slot also makes things worse, not better.
In your last post you "preach" "positive reinforcement" while throughout this thread you are literally trashing that #3 hitter as often ending innings, seemingly with runners in scoring position, to the extent of posting that you would have "coached" him to crowd the plate, never swing the bat, and you would have, using your words, "take the bat away from the #3 hitter for this at-bat and give it to the #4 batter with less than 2 outs and let him drive in the tying and perhaps go ahead run."
Pardon me, but I am having a hard time understanding how taking the bat out of the hands of the #3 guy, and talking with your son, others, and this board about doing it is such a positive coaching approach as contrasted with a divisive and undermining coaching approach.
Second guessing that the #4 would have gotten the hit and drove in 2 is what ESPN analysts get "paid" to do.
They are not coaches.
Even then, this board had plenty of posters who detested Joe Morgan because his "paid" analysis came off just like you come off in this thread....EXCEPT you are part of the coaching staff.
Members of the coaching staff do not pronounce they are going to throw a HC and his coaching decision under the bus and tell their son, "and others all day long."
Finally, you have mentioned several times the #3 didn't get the bat on the first squeeze attempt because the ball was over his head. Well, the catcher caught it so one might reasonably expect, in a squeeze situation, the hitter knows he needs to get the bat on the ball. He doesn't need to bunt it fair but he needs to do everything possible to protect that runner, to protect against the out. That is the very essence of the "suicide" aspect of the squeeze.
Are their pitches where putting bat on the ball is almost impossible? Of course.
Had you said the pitch was at his head/behind him, or a pitch out, that might change my thoughts on "poor execution."
Everything you posted says poor execution, twice.
Finally, are there coaches who don't believe in the squeeze? Absolutely. Bruce Bochy is one right her in SF. Are there professional managers who do believe in it? Roger Craig,formerly in SF, would use it morning, noon and night in nearly any situation.
From a pure baseball perspective, using the squeeze is not a "stupid decision" that "everyone" must bow down to your "superior" second guessing, Monday morning coaching.
As JH properly summarizes, and what others also tried to say, it is a decision that can be debated on a message board.
You went far beyond those boundaries, in my opinion. When I just assumed you were a parent, I posted my response to your handling of the situation.
To now learn you are a member of the coaching staff...well, I am speechless for sure.
From my perspective about the integrity and responsibilities of a youth baseball coach, what you have posted in this thread isn't the type of "coaching" I respect or think is deserving of "earning" respect.
I am sorry to be so blunt.
This should have been an issue for and within the coaching staff and no one else, worked and discussed completely and directly, and only, with the HC and no one else, especially not your son, his teammates, and "others all day long."