Skip to main content

Originally Posted by Stats4Gnats:

coach2709,

 

Why is it that whenever you coaches get criticized you circle the wagons and try to stop anyone else from expressing themselves unless they’re part of your little clique? So now I’m not allowed to say anything unless my coaching bones are at least as good as yours? Horse rockets! Sounds like I said something that struck home and y’all don’t have a way to refute it.

 

Calling pitches from dugouts is something relatively new. While coaches have always had the ability to send in signals, its only relatively recently that its done on close to every pitch.

 

As a matter of fact, a lot of what I think comes from my experiences as a catcher, from a very good friend of mine who coached a DI here for over 30 years, and a another very good friend who pitch in the pros for over 20 years, scouted for 10, and was a ML pitching coach for another 12. Those things shaped my opinion on the subject and that opinion is that its simply not necessary for a coach to call pitches.

 

My experience was that I was told it was my job to call pitches, and therefore my responsibility. The college coach says it was his job to prepare his players for the next level, and the pro coach says pitchers and catchers get paid a lot of $$$$ to do that.

 

Maybe you don’t agree with those opinions, but you have no right to refuse the right to express them because you’re miffed of the person expressing them doesn’t meet your standard of who is allowed to speak.


I'm truly baffled here.  I never said  you couldn't express an opinion I just asked your background which leads to more credibility for your opinion.....or could take away credibility for your opinion.  If we were talking about how to best use nuclear power going into the future each one of us could have their own opinion about what is best but if one of us had actually studied or worked in anything to do with nuclear power then their opinion carries a little more weight than the rest of us.  Doesn't necessarily mean we will be right but there is more credibility.  It's called experience.

 

What is there to refute?  What in my posts says that coaches calling pitches IS THE RIGHT WAY TO DO IT? I haven't seen where cabbage or bball said it was that way either.  The only thing we've done is provide reasons why it's done.  They were very valid reasons why it was done.  In fact most of my posts are on your side in that I believe the pitcher / catcher should call their own game if prepared.  But you're not always going to get them prepared for myriad of reasons.  That's all we've said - you're the one who is getting upset.  One thing I've learned in my time is that just because you're upset doesn't mean you're right.

 

Those are very good and credible sources to form an opinion but do those 3 people truly represent all of baseball?  No just like our 3 opinions represent all of baseball.  I was a catcher back in the day as well.  I called my own game and nobody ever taught me how.  Looking back on it now I wish someone would have taught me more or made the calls for me because, while I think I did a good job, it wasn't the best I could do.  I'm going out on a limb here and saying that's how it was for most of us going back into the day.  We were given the job, nobody taught us anything and that's how it became to be.  Well times change and so do how we do things.  Without change football would still be running the T formation and not the spread offenses that create the use of athletes.  Whether it was good or bad is debatable (I personally think the transition to the spread is a good thing) but it was change and we had to handle it.  Calling pitches from the dugout is a change - good or bad is debatable - but we need to learn how to handle it.

 

Nobody here is miffed because we don't agree with you.  Disagreement doesn't mean that someone is upset at another person.  It's possible to disagree with someone without getting miffed.  But when someone twists what is said or goes after someone else for having a different point of view then that is when people get miffed.

Originally Posted by LOW337:

It's been a while since I posted anything but I was curious what everyone's thoughts were on these college coaches calling pitches.


I was watching an NCAA regional game on tv this season between Miami and Oklahoma State.  Miami threw a 3-1 breaking ball to the first hitter in the bottom of the first.  That amazed me.  The only thing I could come up with was they were fearful of contact.  Miami had 8 more at bats to score runs and they were scared of contact from the very first hitter OSU sends to the plate in the game?


I know this topic can cause a big debate and I understand the argument for calling pitches (they have all of the information, I'm not leaving my career up to a 19 yr old etc...).  I jokingly refer to the college game as the 3-2 breaking ball league.  It seems all they ever do is pitch to create swings and misses because most college hitters struggle with soft stuff.


The thing I think these guys that call pitches don't pay attention to is the obvious.  The score, the situation and how the hitter reacts to what I've thrown him.  In my opinion it's not what you throw so much as it is where you throw it.  I've routinely seen college pitchers not be able to command the bottom of the strike zone.  I feel the focus is on pitching on the edges and not enough emphasis is put on keeping the ball down.  Down is a location!  The best pitch in baseball is and always will be a well located fastball, in my opinion.


What is the difference in a college team coming out and beating their opponent 3-1 one day and losing 12-1 the next.  Same guy called pitches.  My number one guy pitched on Friday and we won 3-1 then my number two guy pitched Saturday and we lost 12-1 with the same information and same guy calling  pitches.  My number one and two are very close in ability.  What's the difference?  In my opinion 9 times out of 10 it wasn't what they threw but rather where they threw it.


As you can tell I am not a big fan of calling pitches for catchers/pitchers.


So many of the major college coaches are making so much money and I understand that winning is priority.  But if they are such good coaches you would think they would be able to teach a catcher how to call a game.

 

Pitches are not called in professional baseball.  Major league teams have more than enough scouting information especially come playoff and World Series time.  There is a ton of money on the line and they don't call pitches.  

 

I don't ever think my mind will be changed but was just wondering others opinions on the topic.  

LOW337, I think your observations are very well positioned. I am going to date myself here. My last year of school ball was the first year of aluminum. I felt that the game evolved at that point because a hitter no longer had to be a hitter just a hacker. Pitchers just learned to throw away from contact. With the fairly recent revisions kids are having to learn how to hit again. I don't believe the soft stuff nemesis really went away just becomes more obvious again.

As a pitcher, I always took pride in hitting my spots consistently. If a particular pitch hit my spot and it was still hit well then I could do nothing but tip my hat and go after the next one up.

This example is not directed at you but just a generalization. I faced a fellow that played in the Twins organization behind Rod Carew, this guy did not have a big league career here but did quite well in Japan. The book on him was low and away. I tossed a two seam FB up at 92 with good run away RH vs RP. I felt very good about the location, started it on the outer third and it was probably three inches off the plate when he smoked it over the RF wall. As he rounded third and about half way home he looks at me and grinsI just tipped my cap to him and got him to pop up the next time around to first on the same pitch. 

coach2709,

 

I don’t come here looking for credibility, and I don’t judge what anyone says in a forum like this one based on their experience. Either I agree with someone or I don’t. I try not to say things someone would take personally, but I can’t control how things I say are taken. And I try not to take things personally, even when I’m pretty sure they are meant that way, but sometimes I fail.

 

I don’t know anyone that posts here personally, so making any judgment about them would be childish and foolish, and since as far as I know, no one knows me personally, I would ASSUME they’d feel the same way. But in the real world things don’t happen as they should, and people get their noses out of joint for all kinds of reasons.

 

No, those people don’t represent all of baseball, but then again, no one does. The thing is, I know those guys PERSONALLY! I’ve sat in their homes and they’ve sat in mine. We’ve watched ballgames together and discussed things as they were happening, where we could no only hear what each other said, but got the feedback from body language, speech inflection, and in context with the game. That’s a totally different environment than this is, and luckily for me, I understand the difference. I just wish everyone did.

 

Finally, then I’ll let this go because I am beginning to take it personally, but just exactly what is it I said that TWISTED what  someone else said, and what do you see as me GOING AFTER someone for their having a different point of view? I’m willing to at least TRY to express why I said something, even though I’m pretty sure it won’t make any difference because its obvious that some folks here aren’t like you and are MIFFED.

Originally Posted by bballman:
I agree with BOF. College pitchers are EXPECTED to be able to throw any pitch in any count to get an out. That doesn't mean it always happens, but it is expected of them. Shoot, even a FB isn't going to find the strike zone every time. But if a pitcher in college or above can't be counted on to throw an off speed pitch in a 3 ball count, he's not going to be finding himself on the mound very often.

I think you are giving college pitchers a little more credit than they deserve. They are realistically throwing pitches "where they want it" about 50% to 60% of the time if they are good.

 

Even MLB pitchers struggle from time to time with the location of their pitches.

 

 

I'm not disagreeing with that Jimmy. What I'm saying is if a coach loses confidence that a pitcher has a chance of throwing that pitch for a strike, it's not good. If a pitcher can only throw a fastball in a 3 ball count, he will probably get teed off on. I never said a pitcher can throw off speed for a strike 100% of the time. I'm more talking about a coach having confidence in calling that pitch in a 3 ball count. I don't think coaches expect a strike 100% of the time, but if they don't ever feel like they can call it, that's trouble.

Hope that makes more sense.

Originally Posted by bballman:

I'm not disagreeing with that Jimmy. What I'm saying is if a coach loses confidence that a pitcher has a chance of throwing that pitch for a strike, it's not good. If a pitcher can only throw a fastball in a 3 ball count, he will probably get teed off on. I never said a pitcher can throw off speed for a strike 100% of the time. I'm more talking about a coach having confidence in calling that pitch in a 3 ball count. I don't think coaches expect a strike 100% of the time, but if they don't ever feel like they can call it, that's trouble.

I sure wish there were some way to tie the result of a pitch with the intent of it, because without that, everything is really nothing more than guesses and amoeba like trial and error.

 

Someone like myself can do everything we can to measure something by taking into account as many things as possible and doing everything in our power to make sure the numbers are valid, but the conclusions drawn from them will never be very reliable because there’s so many un-measurable factors.

 

FI, let’s say the count is 3-1 and the coach calls a slider down and in, hoping for a swing and miss or weakly hit ball some defender can make a play on. That coach might want that pitcher to execute the plan well, but understands there’s always a chance it won’t be. But here’s where the problems arise.

 

No one I know of who charts pitches, charts the intent, so right from the gitgo the data is sorely lacking. The result may be accurately recorded, but without knowing what and where the pitch was intended to be thrown, what is really known? And if the result isn’t accurately recorded, what can really be taken from what took place?

 

In the end, its likely the coach is the pitch caller and therefore has to have confidence that what he calls will be executed well, but what about the pitcher’s confidence? Doesn’t that play a huge part in how the pitch gets executed too?

 

It’s a very complicated and difficult to understand paradigm.

I played professional baseball as a pitcher.  I had the ability to shake off my catcher if I did not like the call.  However, college catchers are often not tuned-in on opposing batters,  They do have the opportunity to read scouting reports.  But, I think the issue is, they are also student-athletes.  Spending the time needed to learn batters could take-away from education time.  Coaches are suppose to be the fill-in for the catcher.  They suppose to know the opposing batters. 
 
I also agree that a well placed fast ball can solve alot of problems.  But if it is not well=placed, and the count is in the favor of the hitter--disaster could be the result.  I remember throwing Fred McGriff a curve ball on 2-3 count.  He was expecting a FB--he struck-out swinging. I can say the coach knows his pitcher abilities.
 
 
Originally Posted by LOW337:

It's been a while since I posted anything but I was curious what everyone's thoughts were on these college coaches calling pitches.

 

I was watching an NCAA regional game on tv this season between Miami and Oklahoma State.  Miami threw a 3-1 breaking ball to the first hitter in the bottom of the first.  That amazed me.  The only thing I could come up with was they were fearful of contact.  Miami had 8 more at bats to score runs and they were scared of contact from the very first hitter OSU sends to the plate in the game?

 

I know this topic can cause a big debate and I understand the argument for calling pitches (they have all of the information, I'm not leaving my career up to a 19 yr old etc...).  I jokingly refer to the college game as the 3-2 breaking ball league.  It seems all they ever do is pitch to create swings and misses because most college hitters struggle with soft stuff.

 

The thing I think these guys that call pitches don't pay attention to is the obvious.  The score, the situation and how the hitter reacts to what I've thrown him.  In my opinion it's not what you throw so much as it is where you throw it.  I've routinely seen college pitchers not be able to command the bottom of the strike zone.  I feel the focus is on pitching on the edges and not enough emphasis is put on keeping the ball down.  Down is a location!  The best pitch in baseball is and always will be a well located fastball, in my opinion.

 

What is the difference in a college team coming out and beating their opponent 3-1 one day and losing 12-1 the next.  Same guy called pitches.  My number one guy pitched on Friday and we won 3-1 then my number two guy pitched Saturday and we lost 12-1 with the same information and same guy calling  pitches.  My number one and two are very close in ability.  What's the difference?  In my opinion 9 times out of 10 it wasn't what they threw but rather where they threw it.

 

As you can tell I am not a big fan of calling pitches for catchers/pitchers.

 

So many of the major college coaches are making so much money and I understand that winning is priority.  But if they are such good coaches you would think they would be able to teach a catcher how to call a game.

 

Pitches are not called in professional baseball.  Major league teams have more than enough scouting information especially come playoff and World Series time.  There is a ton of money on the line and they don't call pitches.  

 

I don't ever think my mind will be changed but was just wondering others opinions on the topic.  

 

YOUR ARE DEAD-ON.
Confidence in the pitcher. Even on the pros we call a 4 ball pass instead of nibbling and miss against a Miguel Cabrera type hitter.
Originally Posted by bballman:
I'm not disagreeing with that Jimmy. What I'm saying is if a coach loses confidence that a pitcher has a chance of throwing that pitch for a strike, it's not good. If a pitcher can only throw a fastball in a 3 ball count, he will probably get teed off on. I never said a pitcher can throw off speed for a strike 100% of the time. I'm more talking about a coach having confidence in calling that pitch in a 3 ball count. I don't think coaches expect a strike 100% of the time, but if they don't ever feel like they can call it, that's trouble.

Hope that makes more sense.

 

Originally Posted by Coachfactor:

…I also agree that a well placed fast ball can solve alot of problems.  But if it is not well=placed, and the count is in the favor of the hitter--disaster could be the result.  I remember throwing Fred McGriff a curve ball on 2-3 count.  He was expecting a FB--he struck-out swinging.

 

But isn’t true that any pitch, whatever the count, well placed or not, can get clocked or be completely missed, not just the FB? I agree with you in general, but I’ve seen too many great hitters look horrible on pitches that miss their mark by 2’, and too many poor hitters rock pitches that were perfectly executed, to say there’s one answer that fits all situations.

 

I can say the coach knows his pitcher abilities.

 

Are you saying that’s always equally true, or are you saying that’s what SHOULD be true?

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×