I bowed out earlier but after several posts on one side of the argument, I thought I'd at least make things interesting again...
Many of you are categorizing the bowl game as an insignificant scrimmage. Most college programs work all year with a few specific goals in mind… win conference, go to a big bowl game. College bowl games are not played like the NFL Pro Bowl. They are played to win. They are played with pride. For many of the players, the teammates, this will be the biggest (and last) game of their lives… regardless of the possible watering down effect of the NCAA playoff structure. Last time to go to war with their band of brothers. In the locker room, on the practice field, this game is huge. The Sun Bowl, BTW, is a game that typically draws 50K fans and has historically been one of the bigger bowls. The main attraction to this year’s Stanford v NC matchup would clearly have been McCaffrey. Do you really think this doesn’t matter to the teammates, the coaches, the student fan base, the alumni, the Stanford fans in general, and yes, all the entities that put on this event and TV viewership?
This is not an argument about comparing player standards to when coaches leave… as I mentioned before, this is apples and oranges. When a coach accepts a job at another school, there is the immediate factor of direct conflict of interest. That is a non-existent factor with the decision of the player. Even though he knows he plans to go pro, he has no such conflict with playing out his college career.
Also, this is not an argument about the structure of the big bad NCAA and sticking it to the man. This is about one player’s decision to not play in the last game of his college career. Is he doing the right thing?
Lastly, 20/20 said... NOTHING is more important than the goal of future generations achieving happiness and financial security. and also, when faced with this decision, your definitive advice would be "son grab the money and don't let it go.”
Well, I would argue that happiness and financial security are often two completely different things... even more so when we are talking big money. Have you heard some of the statistics regarding people who win the lottery? It’s usually gone in two years and results in the start of a decline in the level of happiness (below pre-lottery win levels) in the lives of the “winners”.
When it comes to making difficult decisions involving money, my teach will always be the same as it is with everything else… not “grab the money and don’t let go”, but “do the right thing” and “be a good person to others”. Always, for everything, “do the right thing”. Sometimes, that will mean take a pass on the money. Sometimes that will mean that the money should not be the primary motivator.
I believe that when one follows these guidelines, one will always be able to provide and find happiness.
20/20, I don’t know your whole story but I’ll bet it wasn’t money that was the primary factor that allowed you to become the first in your family to graduate from college but your determination and character. So, maybe your Dad gave you something more important than the money and "things" he couldn't give.