I have slept on it and haven't sent the email yet. I have had numerous face to face conversations with the HC, face to face talks are not an issue. However, the problem with face to face talks with people that won't own their actions, in my experience, they tend to deny deny deny that the conversation took place. I choose the email route to avoid that issue when it comes to major topics like this one, paper trails are nice to have down the road if things go sideways.
On face value I tend to agree with others in the sentiment that 106 is not necessarily a horrible number. He was cruising, no long innings, felt great, showed no signs f fatigue and wanted to go more....what kid that age wouldn't?
The weather was absolutely perfect, probably upper 70's. This was only his second time on the mound this season, and he is the daily SS. I had already laid the foundation that if they were to use him as a pitcher, it would be in the last game of the week.
A 70/75 pitch limit was set by the V HC last season after the other case that I mentioned. There was absolutely no reason for any of the JV pitchers to go that long, especially with the philosophy the JV HC has been using up until this game...which is the LL approach, if you don't play today, you play next game, regardless of talent level.
I can understand a pitcher , later in the season, on V, maybe when the team is jockeying for a seeding position in the District playoffs, or maybe even in a District playoff game, but definitely not JV. So, that will be my parameters set forth in the email. Unless he is pulled up to supplement the V staff when JV season is over, his pitch limit from this point forward will be 70 pitches+- finishing a batter, and still on ly the last game of the week.
maybe I am over reacting after Lefthooks injury, who was last years #1 and starting CF when not pitching....I just won't take the chance....there is no logical reason to do so,