PGStaff posted:
It would be difficult for an official scorekeeper, but one could go back and check TrackMan data. Problem is TrackMan is only available part of the time.
Our scouts are instructed to grade things like discipline. They also include that type info in their scouting reports. Even noting obvious bad calls by umpires.
While there have been some bad ball hitters, most hitters hit strikes the best. In fact, they hit best in an area within the strike zone. Even true for the bad ball hitters.
Once again, I have absolutely no problem with the way you or professional scouts evaluate the best players in the game. But I don’t work with that very small group and neither do most HS coaches in the country. For any one team, what tools does the average coach have available to help him rank his hitters to identify those who need more work in that area rather than use the “shotgun” approach of treating everyone the same way?
Our team is pretty much average. We surely don’t have Trackman and don’t have anyone who could be dedicated to charting pitches, so if there’s a way to do it it’s gonna likely fall on me as the SK to do it. With all the things I’m doing during a game, the only thing I see that might give at least some idea is looking at called pitches similar to what I showed in the pitchkindslookb.pdf attachment above.