Can someone explain why some kids (seems like a lot these days) opt for Juco year or prep school/IMG type academy after HS taking a D2 or D3 offer?
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
It’s beneficial if injuries interfered with recruiting. Or if a kid is a late bloomer and his abilities are on the rise.
If a kid attends a prep school the NCAA clock doesn’t start ticking.
If a kid plays at a JuCo the five to play four clock starts ticking. He loses a year of eligibility.
Sometimes kids attend JuCos because they’re not good students and aren’t NCAA eligible.
Sometimes kids prep a year at high academic preps to make sure they can amp up their academic ability before entering a high academic college. This occurs more often with basketball and baseball.
If a kid is only looking to physically develop and/or develop skills but not play attending a JuCo as a part time student doesn’t start the clock.
There are viable situations for all these options.
A guy I know who puts a lot of kids in P5 schools was recently told by a top SEC coach that if he were a stud player he’d be taking a post grad/gap year. He said non-stud players should just go to school as planned and hope for the best.
Money: prep schools cost a huge amount. Jucos are usually very cheap.
Also access: prep schools might take only a few players, jucos can take 80+.
@TerribleBPthrower posted:A guy I know who puts a lot of kids in P5 schools was recently told by a top SEC coach that if he were a stud player he’d be taking a post grad/gap year. He said non-stud players should just go to school as planned and hope for the best.
Why? Because of the draft?
Attachments
Images (1)
The post above came from a JuCo Twitter feed. It may seem harsh but there is a lot of truth in it and it’s good advice.
@KennieProton posted:Why? Because of the draft?
I’m guessing so they don’t start their clock. My friend mentioned the chances of the bottom of the class having a meaningful career at the school right now were really low. Therefore they should just go to school and hope their plan works out. He said the stud players are more likely to have an impact and it makes sense for them to delay.
Thanks. By right now, what does your friend or the SEC Coach mean? 20/21/22 HS Grad or does it go beyond that?
@TerribleBPthrower posted:I’m guessing so they don’t start their clock. My friend mentioned the chances of the bottom of the class having a meaningful career at the school right now were really low. Therefore they should just go to school and hope their plan works out. He said the stud players are more likely to have an impact and it makes sense for them to delay.
The chances for the bottom of the class to have a meaningful career (at a competitive program) are always low. They are worse than ever now. You don’t want to be in that group wherever you go.
Juco vs prep school (or gap year) differ on eligibly clock when it comes to D1. You have 5 calendar years to play 4 season. That clock starts when you start any college as a full time student. Once the clock starts, not many situations can stop or delay it.
Personally, I think choosing the Juco route to avoid the overcrowding in D1 is a mistake. There are 5 or 6 high school graduation years eligible to play ball right now because of the COVID seasons. There are extra guys trying to play baseball at every level and division. Until all of those COVID years age out, there will be more players than normal. Prep school or gap year shifts your 4 playing years out one year, so technically it pushes you farther out into the age-out process, but I don’t think the difference is enough to choose that option solely based on the COVID angle.
To me, the objective hasn’t changed. Do your research and find a place where you can play. Were you counting on a senior graduating in order to get playing time? That’s a bad strategy because some other freshman or a transfer could be coming in who’s better than you. Look at the level of play at a school, and be honest with yourself about whether you belong there. There are lots of things out of your control once you get there, but make sure you can play at that level and have a decent chance to earn playing time.
Here are some good links concerning JUCOs
https://keepplayingbaseball.or...-college-plan-ahead/
https://keepplayingbaseball.or...o-baseball-part-1-2/
https://keepplayingbaseball.or...ll-part-2-academics/
https://keepplayingbaseball.or...part-3-transferring/
I like keepplayingbaseball.org. This jumped out at me:
"One in every five D1 baseball players are 2-year transfers."
@adbono posted:The post above came from a JuCo Twitter feed. It may seem harsh but there is a lot of truth in it and it’s good advice.
in the 80's my we (NAIA school) had both Oregon State (D1) and Lewis and Clark State (NAIA) on the schedule. there was no question that LC State was way better. Extreme example since LC State was in dynasty mode back then, but, as a non-NCAA, they weren't beholden to silly academic rules and such. They had a bunch of guys who were not NCAA qualified but were NAIA qualified, so they pulled some amazing talent.
@anotherparent posted:I like keepplayingbaseball.org. This jumped out at me:
"One in every five D1 baseball players are 2-year transfers."
I'd love to see the ratio related to D1 starters. I bet it's higher.
@TerribleBPthrower posted:I'd love to see the ratio related to D1 starters. I bet it's higher.
I’ll bet it’s much higher. Transfers aren’t freshman prospects. They’re brought in expected to fill holes in the roster.
@RJM posted:I’ll bet it’s much higher. Transfers aren’t freshman prospects. They’re brought in expected to fill holes in the roster.
Washington State 2020 Team Roster Player Attrition
Transfer out (split 2yr vs 4yr), tentatively available in April
2020 Player attrition by Position
Attachments
Images (2)
@KennieProton posted:Why? Because of the draft?
I think mostly for college, because many HS players are physically not ready for college ball where it is about production.
For the draft being older is a disadvantage as teams perceive it as limiting potential for growth it you are older, there are mlb teams who specifically target very young HS players and also young college players in the draft as they have more potential to grow and can easily add 20-30 pounds of muscle in the minor league system.
But still it is better to be older and be ready than be younger and not be ready.
To Dominik’s point above. This whole “let’s hold the kid back a year so he is bigger and stronger” when they are younger makes little sense to me. For transparency, my son was held back in kindergarten. But it was on recommendations of his teacher for maturity purposes at the time. By the end of the year, she had decided she was wrong and advised he go forward. We, as his parents, felt like he needed that year for maturity. He has a late August birthday so was less than a week from being in a different class anyway. Back to the story. If your kid is actually talented enough, works hard enough, has the drive and desire to play baseball at the collegiate and professional level, is holding him back really gonna make the difference?? I think no. But it most certainly WILL put him at a disadvantage when he reaches the professional level. It doesn’t seem like a year or a half year matters, but it does in the opinion of the MLB team looking at your son. They would MUCH rather have a 20 yo junior than a 21 yo junior. I know it sounds crazy, but we lived it. So I would suggest thinking long and hard about holding your son back for athletic purposes only. Again, just one dad’s opinion.
Almost every kid that comes to mind (at least locally) that plays or has been given the opportunity to play at the next level follows a very similar blueprint. Start KN at 6, play 2 years at 12u, and/or repeat 8th grade. This isn't anything new in my area, and kids most definitely benefit from doing so. At least until the pack catches up with them. I would guess that for the really talented ones this happens at the major league level.
Granted, I don't have the stats in front of me, but I would venture to say that the vast majority of baseball players that play at some form of the "next level" are older, not younger when compared to their peers. Maybe I'm wrong, but it doesn't seem so from my experiences.