TR,
I think I know where you're coming from, but it doesn't have much to do with scouting. If the kid who ran the 7.6 ran a 6.8 he would be much better yet, wouldn't he? He wouldn't lose his instincts because he improved his running speed. Someone throwing 89 from the outfield doesn't mean he can pitch, it just means he might have a good arm from the outfield. I've seen 89's that were real good and 89's that weren't so good.
If Bernie Williams didn't have running ability we might not even know who he is. He is a good example of just how important certain things (like running speed) are. He won four gold gloves as a centerfielder and stole 147 bases while scoring 1366 runs. He also had 55 triples. None of that would have happened if he couldn't run fast. Yes, there were many others who were smarter runners, but most of them didn't play centerfield in the Big Leagues. Besides his biggest problem was dealing with the signs for some reason.
I think people need to know how these things work. Great instincts and being a smart baserunner are great, but if you are trying to go first to third, every .2 of a second equals approximately one full stride. The guy with the great instincts gets a much better jump. If he runs a 7.5 60 and a 6.5 runner get the same jump the 6.5 runner will reach 3B approximately 5 full strides before the 7.5 runner.
I understand instincts, but the best instincts in history can't make up for 5 full strides. That would mean the 7.5 runner would have to have a full 5 stride jump over the 6.5 runner. And then they would both arrive at 3B at about the same time provided they both ran the same route. And the easiest thing in the world to teach is how to round the bags. And there is a lot of important things defensively and offensively besides how many bases are stolen and that pertains to running speed or lack of it.
BTW, scouting is all about player comparisons. I hate to think we would be running the 60 for the parents of all people. That thought has never even crossed my mind.
Here are the people at an event we did this winter who are interested in getting those running times. As can be seen, scouts want to get that information.
It's the scouts and college recruiters who care the most about running times. If they didn't care they wouldn't time them or call and ask about them. Same for the radar gun readings. Sure they might like the slower guy better at times, but that is because of the rest of the package. Being a smart base runner with good instincts IS extremely important. After that, the difference becomes which player can actually run the fastest. Truth is, if you can't run, you had better be able to hit and play a position that doesn't require running speed.
When it comes to running ability... It seems pretty simple to me. There is always a target or finish line. Where ever that target is 1B, 2B, 3B, HP, or to the ball... the guy who gets there quickest is the one scouts are looking for. At least when it comes to running ability.
All that said, it is possible to be quick without having exceptional speed. Quickness is very important in baseball. Maybe that's what you mean. It's just that sometimes distance has to be covered and that is when lack of speed sticks out like sore thumb.
"Results oriented" would be more closely associated with "stats". Velocity, and running times are more about tools not stats. Scouts don't care much about stats, but they care a lot about tools. The present day results in a young player mean very little to a scout. Fast enough at one level doesn't make a player fast enough at a higher level. The game changes speeds with each level.