Originally Posted by infielddad:
This has caused me to do some thinking on many questions:
1.) are parents stakeholders in the "athletic education" of their child?
Yes they are because no matter how irritating, cancerous, supportive or great a parent is they ARE a part of the make up of the team. If a coach says they are not part of the process I'm willing to bet that they will have more troubles than successes. Not a good move.
2.) if so, does the athletic "stakeholder" equate to being a stakeholder in the academic education?
Obviously parents are stakeholders in the academic education but to give a 1:1 or equal relationship to academic and athletic education is a huge mistake. In the grand scheme of things those two areas are not equal. Academic is way more important than athletic therefore when it comes to athletic the parents do not NEED to be as involved even if they WANT to be involved.
3.) Does the fact that education is a right and HS athletics a privilege have a meaningful importance in the discussion?
I think this helps nail my point above in that the two areas are not equal. You have to be educated but you don't have to be athletic. In order to maximize the educational opportunities for kids you need parental involvement but you don't have to have it for athletics. In my classroom I will have in the neighborhood of 90 kids each day per semester / 180 kids each day for the school year. What happens to one kid typically doesn't affect the other ones. Through different strategies - example would be differentiation - I can match the needs of each kid to what I'm teaching. In order to reach those needs I need to be able to communicate with parents to reach them. I have to find ways to make each kid successful to reach their potential. Good parents make that easier / bad parents make it almost impossible so it's VITAL to get that interaction. In athletics what Johnny does on the field WILL affect what happens to Bobby. The abilities of each kid are going to fall on a spectrum - some at the high end and some at the low end with everyone else in the middle somewhere. Just like a classroom yet unlike the field the classroom doesn't have bench to put the students who cannot perform at the level of the rest of the class. How bad would it be if each week I had to do some sort of state test and I could only put my 9 best out of 30 total kids up for it? Each week the same 9 take that test and we "succeed". At the end of the semester / school year the class gets scholarship money for each win. Why would I put any of the other 21 in that "lineup"? Although the 21 never get to perform on that test they still get the results in the terms of the reward. Just like on a field - those 21 may not have contributed in a game but at the end of the season they are still conference, regional or state champions. They still provide a role on the team in practice to help the 9 get better, they all wear the same jersey and ride the same bus. It's still a team that they all succeed. In that classroom the 21 may not have taken the test but in discussions they may have asked a great question to help the 9 understand the material better. Education is not set up to be successful as a group where each person has a role - athletics are set up to be successful as a group and each person has a role. It may not be the role you want but it's still your role.
4.) if parents are stakeholders in the athletic education of their child, what ethical obligations ride with that, which might be different than for the classroom?
In terms of ethical obligations there's no difference between athletic and academic - safe environment, fair treatment and things that relate to that. What drills we run in practice is the same as what strategies I use to teach - those are at my discretion. Who gets to play and how much is the same as giving each one a test at the end of a unit (remember there's no bench in the classroom). So playing time may not be equal but you're still given an opportunity in practice to prove yourself just like in class if I know a kid is working their tail off and is great but stinks at tests they will get that boost / help to get over the hump to pass. Sometimes it takes creative thinking but the intangibles that are up to the teacher / coach do balance out.
5.) If education is a right but athletics a privilege, should the stakeholders legitmately expect, and the HS coach be expected, to have the same accountability to the stakeholders as a teacher?
As related above yes there should be the same accountability but it's not up to the parents to determine how that accountability is shaped. That's what principals, ADs, school board admin and school board members are for. Their jobs are to ensure that each person they hire for teaching / coaching is qualified, competent and evaluated - not the parent. Mob mentality doesn't cut it - that's chaos.
As someone who has sat in on about 15 interviews in the past 2 weeks let me say this - sometimes we miss on hires. They look good on paper, they look good in the interview, their references come back with good reviews and then it all just falls to pieces for whatever reason. It happens and sometimes you can't just make a change due to many factors. This is both teaching and coaching. Sadly, sometimes that's all we could get. Last school year we had to hire a teacher in the middle of the school year and let me say the pool of applicants is VERY thin at that point in the year. We hired someone who was good on paper, interview and was very knowledgeable in their subject area but for some reason it wasn't a good fit. This person left at the end of the school year and moved on. It was a good split and nobody hated one another but it happens.
Another thing to remember is each sport wants the coach of their team to be the best. Well that's almost impossible to find sometimes. Football coaches are a dime a dozen. I could step into a educational job fair and set up a booth just for football coaches and I would probably be more busy than the schools trying to find teachers. Plus, a lot of them would probably be very good hires. But set up a booth for tennis, golf, swimming, lacrosse and other sports like that (this list will vary by region) it will get very boring and tumbleweeds will roll by. But those parents expect us to hire great coaches when sometimes we are just trying to keep a team together because that's what's best for the kids. Yeah best case scenario is a great coach who will make them better but some sports they are hard to find. So when parents run one off it becomes very hard to replace them just on the fact there's so few of them. Now add in parents run off football and basketball coaches (the revenue making sports) enough then you get that reputation for being "that" school and good coaches won't even apply. You get stuck with whoever we can find. So while it stinks we sometimes miss on hires we can rid of them but it may take a little bit of time to find a better replacement. Especially when the teaching aspect has to be considered. End of the day we would love to hire Knute Rockne's ghost for football but if he can't teach chemistry it's not happening. But parents can do more damage long term if they aren't patient and run coaches off because we now get "that" reputation. We want to hire a great coach and we have the right teaching spot open for the right guy but he won't even consider us because he doesn't want to deal with the headaches that come with phasing out the idiot parents. It's really, really tough to find the right fit.
Now let's talk playing time. Here's how I handle it. Although I have as our school policy we will not discuss playing time I'll give you one shot with me. But I'm not going to side with you - EVER. Here's why I give them a shot - all these conversations start with "I know we can't discuss playing time but I do have a concern about ______ " then it ALWAYS gets turned into playing time. Usually by them saying their kid wants to play in college yet how is that going to happen if they are on the bench. I really wonder if these people think I'm that dumb that I don't know that's their ulterior motive. Anyway, when it finally gets there to the playing time issue I tell them it's coaches decision as to who plays and how much. Now if that settles it we're done and I never give them another opportunity to talk playing time. But if the conversation keeps going on about playing time here's where I throw them for a loop. I look at them and say "alright let's do it. We will increase their playing time by (whatever the sports is and however they get time) this much." Well now they get happy but here's where I get them. "Now you tell me who's going to sit on the bench now. We will meet back here tomorrow and the next day with them and their parents to tell them their kid is now sitting so your kid can play." They don't like this because they haven't thought that far ahead. It hasn't dawned on them that someone has to sit down and when they have to pick who sits they don't like it.
Now if they want to try and name someone I say "OK we will go with ______ sitting down. But I have a question for you - now that we have established the precedent a parent determines playing time what do we do when another parent of a kid on the bench wants to play over your kid so what happens then? Then what happens when the kids who were originally in the lineup playing decide they don't want to sit the bench anymore and their parent comes complaining about wanting to play more? So because you came in here complaining about playing time and now we have a huge mess and the team will now fail. It's a guarantee the team will go down in flames. Or do you want us to treat you and your kid special and not follow the rules the rest of the kids have to follow.
Not going to lie but that typically shuts them up. They see how big of a mess this becomes if we listen to them and give them what they want. Sometimes they don't get it and it gets ugly. Well it was going to get ugly because no matter what I said they weren't going to listen. So it just has to get ugly.
Parents need to relax and let the coaches coach, let the teachers teach and let their kids learn to overcome their obstacles. To fight their own battles - I tell my coaches if a player comes to them asking respectfully about how to play more they better respond with a truthful honest answer. Don't blow them off or give them a BS answer. The players get to have these conversations but they don't get to have what they want.
Since the vast majority of people on here are parents let me leave you with this (if you've made it this far).......
Don't be the reason your school becomes "THAT" school who can't keep coaches.