quote:
Originally posted by wogdoggy:
quote:
Originally posted by headstillhitter:
quote:
Originally posted by Low Finish:
quote:
Originally posted by headstillhitter:
short to and long through and yes we work in a downhill plane initially once launch has started
So if I was to look at the swing you advocate from a dugout view, the swing plane would look like a "V" rather than a "U"?
Neither actually. V & U both to extreme. More like a plane landing and taking back off. Down at slight angle and then higher finish. Would also say that do not like to use cookie cutter in molding kids as well. However, there are the "abolutes" that are taught regardless. I am firm believer that you have different types of hitters and your "spray" guy is going to obviously be different from your guy who is blessed with being 6'3" and having longer levers to work with. Too often your 5"9" 155lb guy wants to hit be the guy who hits homeruns. You have to take what god given talent kid has and get the most out of what they bring to the table. We would be doing an injustice to the "spray" guy and trying to teach him to hit like the 6'3" guy with the long levers. Still stay within the framework of the "absolutes".
www.headstillhitter.com
spray guy big guy doesnt matter..I dont know anybody with 2 different swings..you teach hitting one way,,the right way.
Thats called the absolutes. Their is a difference in guys like Pete Rose, Ichiro, Paul Molitor and guys like Pujols, Mcgwire, Bonds. Theory is exactly what it says. Teaching and coaching is where rubber meets the road.