quote:
Originally posted by cabbagedad:
Wow. I had no idea that the guidelines were so loose across almost every state. Generally, they basically allow pitchers to throw two complete games per week which encourages programs to rely heavily on one ace/horse, which exacerbates the problem. Unbelievable. At least here in CA, they limit to 10 innings per week, which basically requires two starters for programs who play two games per week and three starters for those who play three. This encourages development of more arms.
We operate our program on the safe side, maybe even to a fault. No P has thrown more than 51 innings in a season for us and we typically have five or six pitchers with double digit innings on the season.
If you want to see real war, try suggesting that HSs go to pitch counts the way I have. What’s really sad is, nearly everyone agrees that pitch counts are a far better limitation than innings, but those same people will argue that it shouldn’t apply to HSs. The very same arguments and dire predictions that we all heard when LLI was instituting them, are used again, even though there’s more than ample proof that none of those arguments or dire predictions came true.
I agree that out here in LaLa land, our state assn. has done a pretty good job as far as pitching limitations, but leagues like ours have managed to even improve on that. As you said, because of the limits, pitcher development is almost mandatory with 3 game a week schedules being pretty much standard, trying to get 30 games into a basically 9 week season.
Our 6 team league has mandated that all league games, 3 against each league opponents, will be scheduled in the same calendar week. It would be possible for a team to get by on only 2 pitchers, but it wouldn’t be very likely. So really, coaches in our league have no choice. They have from the 6th of Feb to the 4th of Apr to get 3 starting pitchers ready for the final 5 weeks of the regular season and the playoffs.