Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by CPLZ:
Does jumping to conclusions now count as aerobic activity?


Your a fool CPLZ dont you know that:

Posters are physiologically characterized first by their oxygen dependency or independency. Note the slang terms (an)(aer)obics which are Greek derivatives of "with or without wind (breath)". Part of this (an)aerobicity is the biochemical contributions to the activities. Fast breakdown and recovery or conservation.

Posters are rarely aerobic, using the aerobic system as a primary source for energy in human action (typing). Endurance training is counterproductive, the science of this is well accepted.

Posters use bursts of anaerobic system-generated chemical energy, they are like 5 yd sprinters, up to 20 or more times an inning. Each with a rest period of several seconds.

Want to train posters through running? Then sprint, stop, sprint, stop, repeat. Is this not the sequence of musculature use and energy expediency typical of their required performance?

Ask how many 100m sprinters run endurance in their training regimens. Few, if any. Then why waste precious training time with counterproductive regimens?

How many posters do not come to rest points between posts as an endurance runner who never comes to rest? None

If you train your neuromuscular system, and your biochemical systems, endurance, then do not expect them to be best trained for highly repetitive, explosive, muscular human motions such as typing.
Last edited by BOF
quote:
Originally posted by BOF:
quote:
Originally posted by CPLZ:
Does jumping to conclusions now count as aerobic activity?


Your a fool CPLZ dont you know that:

Posters are physiologically characterized first by their oxygen dependency or independency. Note the slang terms (an)(aer)obics which are Greek derivatives of "with or without wind (breath)". Part of this (an)aerobicity is the biochemical contributions to the activities. Fast breakdown and recovery or conservation.

Posters are rarely aerobic, using the aerobic system as a primary source for energy in human action (typing). Endurance training is counterproductive, the science of this is well accepted.

Posters use bursts of anaerobic system-generated chemical energy, they are like 5 yd sprinters, up to 20 or more times an inning. Each with a rest period of several seconds.

Want to train posters through running? Then sprint, stop, sprint, stop, repeat. Is this not the sequence of musculature use and energy expediency typical of their required performance?

Ask how many 100m sprinters run endurance in their training regimens. Few, if any. Then why waste precious training time with counterproductive regimens?

How many posters do not come to rest points between posts as an endurance runner who never comes to rest? None

If you train your neuromuscular system, and your biochemical systems, endurance, then do not expect them to be best trained for highly repetitive, explosive, muscular human motions such as typing.


Yeah CLPZ! What he said!

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×