I think that Floridafan kind of summed it all up with the above post.
Recruited walk ons do get all of the perks, the only thing missing is scholarship money. Most likely they now replace what would have been the 5%,10% or a book $$ player. My strong suggestion has always been that a player go where coaches are willing to treat that player like everyone else, but give nice scholarship dollars as well. I would discuss the possibility of walking on with a scholarship commitment after the first year or finding academic money.
Spizzlepop,
Not 100% sure but that info you provided might be the coaches entire budget which includes scholarship money as well. No way did Clemson spend an extra 11,000 on my player in extras.
I do beleive it represents an average per player if all players were equal. But the info is good to give one an idea what coaches have to spend, how many players they rostered that year, and the schools commitment to athletics in general, etc.
BTW, for many programs, coaches don't pay a dime for equipment, uniforms, hats, gloves, etc. In fact, they get $$ in their pocket for using certain companies. So don't let them think that they are "spending" money for these things when some aren't. At larger programs, housing, facility improvements, in season meals, books is often picked up by athletic booster clubs as well as other things. That's why some universities employ fund raisers, to raise money privately needed to support their athletic programs. State money is an added perk for coaches. But think about it, that means he may be willing to pay an out of state player, or one that didn't make the requirements while your player uses his money he is entitled to academically regardless of sports. That does make you attractive, but in reality the coach is really not giving you much in the way of his budget. JMO.
Will be interesting to see where coaches will go with all of this. With dwindling school budgets, 25% minimum scholarship, there is nothing written in stone that one must have 35 players on roster so I strongly suggest that everyone not assume 5-8 extra players will be needed at every program. I don't know if it makes the walk on more valuable to their program or not, most likely depends on budgets. The school that normally didn't fund all 11.7 now has to spend every penny to give scholarships they normally wouldn't give, doesn't leave much room for more, unless there is a strong booster program to help support the program.