Skip to main content

I am a pitcher on the University of New Hampshire's club baseball team. I am new to this site and had a question about arm action.

To me there's two main schools of thought regarding arm action. Many indviduals (and I believe Chris O'Leary is one of them) argue that the arm should complete a full circle ending with the pitcher's arm forming a 90 degree angle with his elbow and the ball facing 2nd base or shortstop. Advocates of this style teach pitchers to force their thumbs down and out to get the arm up into launch position. They point to guys like Jeff Weaver and Roy Oswalt as good examples of this.

However, there are also those that believe that pitchers should scalp load and drive their pitching arm elbow up and back to deliver the baseball to the plate. This can be seen clearly in the arm action of pitchers like Joel Zumaya, Adam Wainwright, Mark Prior, and to a less clear degree in the styles of Daisuke Matsuzaka, Matt Cain, and Tim Lincecum. This style of throwing has often been criticized as the cause of elbow injuries.

I have always been taught and have thrown something like what I described as the Chris O'Leary style. What do you guys think is the better arm action for generating velocity?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Arm actions vary in many ways. The hard part is finding what works best for YOU and then enhance things. It makes no sense to claim that one arm action is the cause of problems. Look at Smoltz. Why then is he not hurt and so durrable.
It's not so much about arm action as it is RECOVERY and the other little thing.
See my site for more on me and ideas for these types of developments. www.fletchspen.net
I guess what I meant is that many instructors that teach the "thumbs down and out" style argue that the "drive the elbow up and back" style is the cause of many injuries (Prior is their main example). Personally, I am not suggesting anything of the sort. Actually, I am merely seeking others' opinions on the ups and downs of each style I have presented and wondering as to whether anyone has an opinion on what type of arm action is more mechanically efficent or conducive to velocity (in summarizing my question, I may have even neglected certain other styles of throwing).
Well the arm doesn't generate hardly any velocity, it can only help in the transfer of elastic energy that's already been built up.

I believe Jace hit it on the head

Besides, whatever gets you into a good throwing position, not everyone is going to be the same on this. As long as you get your elbow up to shoulder height, don't worry about how it got up there
quote:
As long as you get your elbow up to shoulder height, don't worry about how it got up there.
IMO, probably the worst advice to give anyone who wants to throw hard.

You always mention elastic energy, but your statement here does not take into account the creating of elastic energy, or the purpose of loading [to unload] the upper torso to throw hard. Timing and loading angles of the shoulder and arm are extremely important for the preservation of the shoulder complex during the high velocity angular rotation of the upper torso to throw.


quote:
Well the arm doesn't generate hardly any velocity, it can only help in the transfer of elastic energy that's already been built up.
If this is true, what role does the arm play when the baseball goes from virtually 0mph to 95mph in .1 sec?
Last edited by cap_n
quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
To me there's two main schools of thought regarding arm action. Many indviduals (and I believe Chris O'Leary is one of them) argue that the arm should complete a full circle ending with the pitcher's arm forming a 90 degree angle with his elbow and the ball facing 2nd base or shortstop. Advocates of this style teach pitchers to force their thumbs down and out to get the arm up into launch position. They point to guys like Jeff Weaver and Roy Oswalt as good examples of this. However, there are also those that believe that pitchers should scalp load and drive their pitching arm elbow up and back to deliver the baseball to the plate. This can be seen clearly in the arm action of pitchers like Joel Zumaya, Adam Wainwright, Mark Prior, and to a less clear degree in the styles of Daisuke Matsuzaka, Matt Cain, and Tim Lincecum.


Let me clarify a couple of things about my position on arm action.

First, I love Greg Maddux's arm action. It's what I look for both when teaching and scouting guys.

I also like the arm action of Roy Oswalt, Nolan Ryan, and Juan Marichal to name a few. They represent different, but equally safe, ways of getting the arm into the proper throwing position.

Second, I don't advocate thumbs down. Instead, I think it's best to go thumbs up (palm facing 3B) as soon as you can.

Third, in terms of the Inverted W, I have two problems with it...

1. The Inverted W is not necessary to throwing well or hard. It's not what great pitchers like Ryan, Clemens, Seaver, Gibson, Koufax, Carlton, Maddux, Glavine and many others did.

2. If you look at guys who do make the Inverted W, you will see a lot of shoulder problems. I'm talking about Mark Prior, Don Drysdale, Billy Wagner, John Smoltz, and many others.

Why teach something that...

1. Isn't necessary.

2. Seems to increase the incidence of shoulder problems.

Finally, I have no problem with scapular loading, as long as the elbows stay below the level of the shoulders. I call that the Horizontal W.

Chris O'Leary
quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
I guess what I meant is that many instructors that teach the "thumbs down and out" style argue that the "drive the elbow up and back" style is the cause of many injuries (Prior is their main example).


I don't advocate thumbs down and out because you can end up with the elbows too high.

I think thumbs up is safer.
Right about Smoltz injury but he still throws the same way (with the arm action mentioned earlier) and it's only an elbow meaning many bounce back. Shoulders are the problem...very few come back the same.
If you pitch beyond the age of 25 without any arm problems, it's rare even with sound mechanics.
And again, arm problems are rarely caused by one thing. It's a combination and accumulation of many other things.
quote:
Originally posted by thepainguy:
quote:
Originally posted by jacetheace:
It makes no sense to claim that one arm action is the cause of problems. Look at Smoltz. Why then is he not hurt and so durrable.


Smoltz has had a series of shoulder problems, which is one reason why he has moved between the rotation and the bullpen.


We are talking about a guy who is still pitching very well at age 40 someting. His arm action is not the problem. Arm problems at that level can be fixed...he got there already. What about all the high school kids with arm problems. That's what this site is all about. Smoltz's arm action is clean and it works well. There are many others with that arm action who have survived also.
IMO - The term “arm action” by itself is not really a mechanical thing. It is a description of how the arm works no matter what mechanics are used. While there are certain mechanics that can help with arm action or hinder good arm action… Arm action to me is a very natural thing, more than it is anything that can be taught. Good arm action is fluid, fast, and effortless… It is something you know when you see it, rather than breaking it down by parts. I think it is possible to have bad mechanics and great arm action or vise versa! Smoltz has great arm action as do most of the top pitchers.
quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
My question then is about the mechanics of the arm during the pitch. I disagree with XFactor and believe that the arm is a key generator of velocity. What then are the mechanics that make for "fluid, fast, and effortless" arm action? Is it thumbs up, thumbs down, inverted W, or something else?


How does the arm generate that velocity? I'm not dis-agreeing with you, just curious what your belief is. Some say it's all the lower half and core/torso and others agree w/ you. I'm not as familiar w/ the latter of the two so any info that you have would be great.

Is arm strength the necessary component of making the arm a "key generator of velocity"?
quote:
Originally posted by jacetheace:
His arm action is not the problem. Arm problems at that level can be fixed...he got there already. What about all the high school kids with arm problems. That's what this site is all about. Smoltz's arm action is clean and it works well. There are many others with that arm action who have survived also.


I disagree.

I think Smoltz's arm action has contributed to his problems (as has Pedro Martinez's). I grant you that it's not as bad as Prior's.

However, it's certainly not what Maddux, Ryan, Koufax, Seaver, Gibson, and those guys do/did.
quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
I disagree with XFactor and believe that the arm is a key generator of velocity. What then are the mechanics that make for "fluid, fast, and effortless" arm action? Is it thumbs up, thumbs down, inverted W, or something else?


I agree with Tom House that a pitcher's arm does not contribute much, if anything, to a pitcher's velocity. Instead, it simply funnels energy that is generated by the much larger muscles of the hips and torso.

I like PG
quote:
While there are certain mechanics that can help with arm action or hinder good arm action… Arm action to me is a very natural thing, more than it is anything that can be taught. Good arm action is fluid, fast, and effortless… It is something you know when you see it, rather than breaking it down by parts. I think it is possible to have bad mechanics and great arm action or vise versa! Smoltz has great arm action as do most of the top pitchers.


Was pretty much what I was getting at.
Some people tend to over-coach. They want to coach every single movement. That tends to get kids to think too much about everything instead of letting the body do what it knows how to do naturally.

Now about the arm not creating velocity

5.34
The role of the Shoulder, Arm, Wrist, and Fingers in Pitching Velocity

"Many pitching coaches ascribe high value to the shoulder, arm, wrist, and fingers as significant contributors to pitching velocity. It is not unusal to hear of coaches concentrating on increasing arm speed or stressing release velocity with the wrist and/or fingers as suggested ways of improving release velocity. However, those attributions are erroneous [that means they're wrong]. There is considerable research that shows pitching velocity is established when the arm is cocked and the lead leg is firmly planted.

Wrist and fingers. Pappas, Morgan, Shulz, and Diana (1995) showed that while the wrist went through degrees of extension and flexion in a pitch, none of the actions contributed to a release velocity. Ostensibly, the wrist is ivolved in positioning the ball for an accurate release. ****, Ford, Ford, and Shin (1995) actually showed that marginally slowing the wrist action before ball release increased pitching velocity. It could be theorized that slowing flexion contributed to maintaining the ball on a linear path rather than pulling it down even to a very small degree. The position of the wrist contributes to the line of force that is applied to the ball.

The fingers do not contribute to release velocity at all (Hore, Watts, & Martin, 1996). Up until release, the only finger action is extension. Flexion occurs after release as a reaction to the force of the ball on the extended fingers.

Shoulder and arm. Jobe, Tibone, Perry, and Moynes (1983) anaylzed EMG activity in the shoulder muscles in pitching. The cocking action of the arm showed a consistent sequence of muscle activation: deltoid, the SIT muscles (scapularis, infraspinatus, teres minor), and then the subscapularis. However, acceleration out of the cocked positions exhibited virtually NO muscle activation. Only when the ball was released and the arm and shoulder needed to slow rapidly in the follow-through were there any high levels of muscular activity. The velocity of a pitch is affected by the elastic properties of the arm (residing mainly in the ligaments, tendons, and isometrically contracted muscles) and NOT by muscular contraction. As is often explained in this book, this confirms the assertion that it is the structural elements in the shoulder and arm that contribute to pitching velocity, not contracting the muscles. That is a concept that many baseball coaches will find difficult to accept. However, it is supported by evidence and contradicts common coaching beliefs.

Simeone (1997) analyzed 41 collect pitchers for maximal external rotation, average and peak internal angular velocity of the shoulder during the acceleration phase of the pitching sequence, and linearl ball velocity at pitch release. No statistically significant relationship were found betweeen any of the variables. This indicated that the moving shoulders and arms make no major contribution to release velocity, that being determined by actions preceding involvment of shoulder in the throwing action.

The throwing actions of both arms were compared (Hore, Watts, Tweed, & Miller, 1996). Timing errors at the fingers had a greater effect than errors at other joints because finger errors were scaled by the higher angular velocity of the hand rather than by the smaller angular velocities of the individual joints. This study showed why it is important to consider the role of control played by the arm, wrist, and fingers rather than velocity generation.

A coach who emphasizes arm, wrist, and finger speed, and late shoulder actions as ways of improving pitching velocity actually will be coaching features that will be detrimental to both pitching velocity and control. Such emphases should be used as a guideline by pitchers about the knowledge and value of a pitching coach."

5.18

Speed of Movements

"A majority of pitching coaches believe that baseball release velocity is a function of the qualities of muscle groups involved in the action. This has given rise to advocating weight training, weighted-ball throwing, among many other activities associated with doing something to the muscles. Russians have known for a long time (Bukreseva, 1955; Farfel, 1950) that 'the speed rate in any joint relfects not so much the speed qualities of a certain muscle group [or groups], but rather the general motor capability for making maximum quick movements' (Genov, 1970a; p. 233).
Training and practicing high velocity movements, such as pitching a baseball, should focus on producing skilled movement patterns that allow the inherent speed qualities of an individual to be fully realized. Attemps to alter muscles through resistance or device training will be largely futile attemps to change pitching velocity in individuals who have stopped growing. One could assert that many pitching coaches 'have lost the plot' if they had it... [E]ffective pitching training should focus on facilitating movement speed about all joints involved in the action. The muscles will take care of themselves.

The velocity of a pitch is determined by many structural features of the body and mechanicals properties of a movement pattern. Speed of movement does not come from slow training of a physiological nature, for example, heavy weight training.
Speed of movement comes from maximum stimulation of the pre-stretch phenomenon in muscles at the muscular level and the coordinated sequencing and timing of movement segments at the complex skill level.

However, one structural factor cannon be ignored or explained away in pitching. That is the Principle of Speed Development.
Performing explosive speed movements is the only way of training explosive speed. Explosiveness resides in the contractile properties of muscle, not in energizing physiological characteristics. Biochemical energy production does not produce movement explosiveness, but the contracile properties of tissues do."


That's all from, Dr. Brent Rushall's portion of the book, where he then explains how Roy Oswalt is good, but could he be great?

You might wanna pick up the book. Perhaps you'd expand your knowledge.
Last edited by XFactor
quote:
Originally posted by XFactor:
I like PG
quote:
While there are certain mechanics that can help with arm action or hinder good arm action… Arm action to me is a very natural thing, more than it is anything that can be taught. Good arm action is fluid, fast, and effortless… It is something you know when you see it, rather than breaking it down by parts. I think it is possible to have bad mechanics and great arm action or vise versa! Smoltz has great arm action as do most of the top pitchers.



Was pretty much what I was getting at.
Some people tend to over-coach. They want to coach every single movement. That tends to get kids to think too much about everything instead of letting the body do what it knows how to do naturally.

Now about the arm not creating velocity

5.34
The role of the Shoulder, Arm, Wrist, and Fingers in Pitching Velocity

"Many pitching coaches ascribe high value to the shoulder, arm, wrist, and fingers as significant contributors to pitching velocity. It is not unusal to hear of coaches concentrating on increasing arm speed or stressing release velocity with the wrist and/or fingers as suggested ways of improving release velocity. However, those attributions are erroneous [that means they're wrong]. There is considerable research that shows pitching velocity is established when the arm is cocked and the lead leg is firmly planted.

Wrist and fingers. Pappas, Morgan, Shulz, and Diana (1995) showed that while the wrist went through degrees of extension and flexion in a pitch, none of the actions contributed to a release velocity. Ostensibly, the wrist is ivolved in positioning the ball for an accurate release. ****, Ford, Ford, and Shin (1995) actually showed that marginally slowing the wrist action before ball release increased pitching velocity. It could be theorized that slowing flexion contributed to maintaining the ball on a linear path rather than pulling it down even to a very small degree. The position of the wrist contributes to the line of force that is applied to the ball.

The fingers do not contribute to release velocity at all (Hore, Watts, & Martin, 1996). Up until release, the only finger action is extension. Flexion occurs after release as a reaction to the force of the ball on the extended fingers.

Shoulder and arm. Jobe, Tibone, Perry, and Moynes (1983) anaylzed EMG activity in the shoulder muscles in pitching. The cocking action of the arm showed a consistent sequence of muscle activation: deltoid, the SIT muscles (scapularis, infraspinatus, teres minor), and then the subscapularis. However, acceleration out of the cocked positions exhibited virtually NO muscle activation. Only when the ball was released and the arm and shoulder needed to slow rapidly in the follow-through were there any high levels of muscular activity. The velocity of a pitch is affected by the elastic properties of the arm (residing mainly in the ligaments, tendons, and isometrically contracted muscles) and NOT by muscular contraction. As is often explained in this book, this confirms the assertion that it is the structural elements in the shoulder and arm that contribute to pitching velocity, not contracting the muscles. That is a concept that many baseball coaches will find difficult to accept. However, it is supported by evidence and contradicts common coaching beliefs.

Simeone (1997) analyzed 41 collect pitchers for maximal external rotation, average and peak internal angular velocity of the shoulder during the acceleration phase of the pitching sequence, and linearl ball velocity at pitch release. No statistically significant relationship were found betweeen any of the variables. This indicated that the moving shoulders and arms make no major contribution to release velocity, that being determined by actions preceding involvment of shoulder in the throwing action.

The throwing actions of both arms were compared (Hore, Watts, Tweed, & Miller, 1996). Timing errors at the fingers had a greater effect than errors at other joints because finger errors were scaled by the higher angular velocity of the hand rather than by the smaller angular velocities of the individual joints. This study showed why it is important to consider the role of control played by the arm, wrist, and fingers rather than velocity generation.

A coach who emphasizes arm, wrist, and finger speed, and late shoulder actions as ways of improving pitching velocity actually will be coaching features that will be detrimental to both pitching velocity and control. Such emphases should be used as a guideline by pitchers about the knowledge and value of a pitching coach."

5.18

Speed of Movements

"A majority of pitching coaches believe that baseball release velocity is a function of the qualities of muscle groups involved in the action. This has given rise to advocating weight training, weighted-ball throwing, among many other activities associated with doing something to the muscles. Russians have known for a long time (Bukreseva, 1955; Farfel, 1950) that 'the speed rate in any joint relfects not so much the speed qualities of a certain muscle group [or groups], but rather the general motor capability for making maximum quick movements' (Genov, 1970a; p. 233).
Training and practicing high velocity movements, such as pitching a baseball, should focus on producing skilled movement patterns that allow the inherent speed qualities of an individual to be fully realized. Attemps to alter muscles through resistance or device training will be largely futile attemps to change pitching velocity in individuals who have stopped growing. One could assert that many pitching coaches 'have lost the plot' if they had it... [E]ffective pitching training should focus on facilitating movement speed about all joints involved in the action. The muscles will take care of themselves.

The velocity of a pitch is determined by many structural features of the body and mechanicals properties of a movement pattern. Speed of movement does not come from slow training of a physiological nature, for example, heavy weight training.
Speed of movement comes from maximum stimulation of the pre-stretch phenomenon in muscles at the muscular level and the coordinated sequencing and timing of movement segments at the complex skill level.

However, one structural factor cannon be ignored or explained away in pitching. That is the Principle of Speed Development.
Performing explosive speed movements is the only way of training explosive speed. Explosiveness resides in the contractile properties of muscle, not in energizing physiological characteristics. Biochemical energy production does not produce movement explosiveness, but the contracile properties of tissues do."


That's all from, Dr. Brent Rushall's portion of the book, where he then explains how Roy Oswalt is good, but could he be great?

You might wanna pick up the book. Perhaps you'd expand your knowledge.


I tend to agree w/ the findings in those studies you posted.
Certainly I understand that the hips and torso are vital to producing velocity. A pitcher that fails to stay closed while striding to the plate loses considerable power and velocity.

That being said, when I see Joel Zumaya throwing 104 MPH I refuse to believe that his arm is not supplying a considerable amount of velocity to the pitch.

Operating under the assumption that the arm has little impact on pitch velocity, what should perfect mechanics look like?
Mechanics allow the transfer of elastic energy from 1 body segment to the next. Speed of movement and momentum and trunk flexion (which is influenced by the speed of movement if I've read correctly) are the best ways of maximum velocity.

I'm not sure how you could discredit what Jobe (1983) shows.

Dick Mills: "What you should do is observe all the power pitchers such as Lincecum, Mariano Rivera, Joel Zumaya, Billy Wagner out of the stretch. Watch the back leg. The back leg in a pitcher is used the same way that the back leg is used in a high jumper getting ready to force his body up so that can get over the bar. He must drop down with his leg to put muscles on stretch quickly but then must come off the leg to force his body up.

If you want to jump up don't you first go down to provide that plyometric effect of quickly putting the muscles on stretch.

A pitcher must do the same but instead of forcing his body up he is forcing his body quickly forward away from the rubber." <-- Which would be increasing the speed of movement, which creates more elastic energy ala velocity.

"Just as with doing a skater or side lunge while exercising (as in our conditioning DVD's) , the amount of knee flexion for a pitcher, out of the stretch or wind-up is not something that needs to be coached. It happens quite naturally.

The important element is to focus on leg drive away from the rubber. Be aggressive.

If you tell a person to step to the side aggressively as far as possible, would you also need to explain the amount of knee flexion required?"
Last edited by XFactor
quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
That being said, when I see Joel Zumaya throwing 104 MPH I refuse to believe that his arm is not supplying a considerable amount of velocity to the pitch.


During a high level throw, the Triceps is flaccid, so that eliminates that large muscle as a source of power. Instead, the extension of the elbow is driven by the rapid deceleration of the rotation of the shoulders. The really hard work is being doing on the opposite side of the muscle group; by the Brachialis as it tries to keep the elbow from hyperextending (which increases the size of the Coronoid Process).

Also, the internal rotators of the shoulder (e.g. rotator cuff) cannot do much good because internal rotation doesn't occur until after the elbow has fully extended. In that case, the hand is pretty much on the axis of rotation, so you're not going to get much in the way of force production.


quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
Operating under the assumption that the arm has little impact on pitch velocity, what should perfect mechanics look like?


Watch Greg Maddux, Tom Glavine, Roy Oswalt, or Nolan Ryan (among others).

- Greg Maddux Clip
Last edited by thepainguy
quote:
Originally posted by XFactor:
Dick Mills: "What you should do is observe all the power pitchers such as Lincecum, Mariano Rivera, Joel Zumaya, Billy Wagner out of the stretch. Watch the back leg. The back leg in a pitcher is used the same way that the back leg is used in a high jumper getting ready to force his body up so that can get over the bar. He must drop down with his leg to put muscles on stretch quickly but then must come off the leg to force his body up...A pitcher must do the same but instead of forcing his body up he is forcing his body quickly forward away from the rubber." <-- Which would be increasing the speed of movement, which creates more elastic energy ala velocity...The important element is to focus on leg drive away from the rubber. Be aggressive.


This is a rehash of drop and drive, which is a strategy that isn't used by very many pitchers (maybe 5 to 10 percent) except for maybe Seaver, Lincecum, and Oswalt (and the degree that Oswalt actually drives is debatable).

For most pitchers, the back foot is PULLED off of the rubber rather than PUSHES off of the rubber.

I will grant you that the back foot generates some sideways force around the time of the leg lift, but that sideways force isn't huge.
quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
Taking into consideration the information presented thus far, I'll offer two more questions. What are the essential checkpoints to powerful mechanics? What are the mechanical absolutes for achieving optimum pitching velocity?


IMO, the answer to both questions is the same.

The hips rotating well (e.g. 60+ degrees) ahead of the shoulders as the photo of Casey Fossum shows.



That means that the hips have to stay closed while the hips open up underneath them into foot plant.

This is facilitated by striding sideways to the target and then starting to open the hips just before the Glove Side foot plants.

quote:
Originally posted by UNHBaseball11:
So does it not matter how the pitcher's throwing arm reaches the position that Fossum's is in the above photo?


I think it does matter in terms of injury prevention, but not in terms of velocity production.

If you're looking for ways to get to that position, Greg Maddux, Roy Oswalt, Jeff Suppan, and Nolan Ryan follow different, but in my opinion equally safe, routes.

Maddux is a short-armer (relatively speaking) whereas Oswalt is more of a long-armer. Suppan and Ryan fall in between the two.

Oswalt




Suppan




Ryan



Ryan



Suppan is probably the closest to Maddux's arm action of the guys listed above.

You'll notice that none of these guys make the Inverted W.
Last edited by thepainguy
Well I was wrong about the "don't worry about the arm", to a degree.

50.29-30

"The pitcher's hand and grip on the ball, and the alignment of the arm swing as the ball is removed from the glove in relation to the pitcher's trunk govern how the humerus moves within the glenoid fossa (shoulder socket). If the picther does not keep his fingers on top of the ball when removing it from his glove, it can effect adversely his arm alignment with his trunk. If the arm is pulled too far back behind his trunk when trying to get into the cocked position, the extreme misalignment can stress the bicep brachii tendon, the rotator cuff muscles, and the glenoid labrum. Ideally, the picther should take the ball down, back, and then up inline with his trunk so that the head of the humerus rotates more efficiently as the arm moves up to the cocked position." <--- As you can see, it deals about injury prevention, not about velocity. But if you don't get your arm into a good throwing position, you're not able to utilize all the elastic energy, and your control will suffer because of the arm not being in a good throwing position.

51.14

"CAUTION: Getting the throwing arm to shoulder height and to the maximum cocked position at landing should not be forced. Pitchers will reach a normal range of motion based on the individual's flexibility. If forcing the shoulder blades to pinch is emphasized, timing is disruptive and is likely to interfere with natural arm positioning."


quote:
What are the mechanical absolutes for achieving optimum pitching velocity?

Increase speed of movement and mometum

7.4

"The two mechanical principles underlying the maximizing of pitching velocity are the 'Conservation of Momentum' and 'Transfer of Momentum'. In a maximal gross motor activity, when a moving body segment is slowed markedly or stopped, its momentum is transferred to another body segment. A baseball pitch is a succession of body segment move-then-stop actions. The load of a baseball is exceptionally light when compared to most sporting objects. The only way to imrpove pitching velocity is to have each movement segment perform optimally, and the sequence of optimal/maximal segment velocities being timed to allow the transfer of accumulated (conserved) maximum momentums. It is the major ingredient in improving pitching velocity.

Pitching velocity can be improved but rarely through physical interventions. A baseball pitch is a complex motor skill that requires body segments to be sequenced and timed appropriately to conserve and transfer momentum [I believe elastic energy lasts about .5 seconds, so timing to get it to the next body segment is very important]. At its completion, the accumulated momentum needs to be controlled and applied to a baseball in a precise manner that will result in particular behaviors by the baseball."


EDITED: Chameleon,
quote:
Moronic


Please prove me wrong. Just because you think I'm wrong doesn't mean you should stop thinking.
Last edited by XFactor
quote:
The velocity of a pitch is affected by the elastic properties of the arm (residing mainly in the ligaments, tendons, and isometrically contracted muscles) .................. As is often explained in this book, this confirms the assertion that it is the structural elements in the shoulder and arm that contribute to pitching velocity.........


I will not dispute any medical research (I am not certified or educated in any medical field). But these passages clearly tell me that the structural condition and properties of the arm have a role in generating throw velocities. Strengthening the arm and improving the elastic properties of the segments do play a part in generating velocity. This is why training the arm for a ballistic movement is important. If velocity is increased solely by properly strengthening and conditioning a poorly conditioned arm, then indeed, the arm is responsible for generating and/or increasing velocity. The arm can not be discounted as having little to do with generating velocity.
quote:
Originally posted by cap_n:
I will not dispute any medical research (I am not certified or educated in any medical field). But these passages clearly tell me that the structural condition and properties of the arm have a role in generating throw velocities. Strengthening the arm and improving the elastic properties of the segments do play a part in generating velocity. This is why training the arm for a ballistic movement is important. If velocity is increased solely by properly strengthening and conditioning a poorly conditioned arm, then indeed, the arm is responsible for generating and/or increasing velocity. The arm can not be discounted as having little to do with generating velocity.


I think it's absolutely critical that a pitcher's arm is properly conditioned. However, IMO the goal is conditioning and force tolerance, not force production.
quote:
Originally posted by deemax:
Pain, Im not sure what you are refering to as a shortarm...


Some people would characterize this photo as showing short-arming...



Maddux's arm action has also changed some over the years.



bbscout's clip show more of a vertical down then up action. As this photo shows, Maddux's current arm action is more down, out, and up.
Last edited by thepainguy
I'm glad someone picked up on that (refering to Cap)

The velocity of a pitch at the arm stage is affected by the elastic properties of the arm (residing mainly in the ligaments, tendons, and isomtrically contracted muscles) and not by muscular contraction. When throwing a 5 oz ball, strength is not stimulated. But, the build up of that comes from the explosive speed of movement and momentum.


6.6-7

"A majority of pitching coaches believe that baseball release velocity is a function of the qualities of muscle groups involved in the action. This has given rise to advocating weight training and weighted-ball throwing, among many other activities associated with doing something to the muscles. Training and practicing high velocity movements, such as pitching a baseball, should focus on producing skilled movement patterns that allow the inherent speed qualities of an individual to be fully realized.
Muscle contractions are unimportant in the relase phase of arm actions when throwing at peak velocity. The contribution of the arm for improving throwing velocity will come from exploiting elastic energy in the contractile structuors and not from muscle fiber changes."


I don't think it's safe to say the arm generates most of the velocity, as it'd be safer to say the speed of movement and momentum (the faster and more explosive you move with good mechanics) will generate more elastic energy, which funnels up to the arm, and the arm helps deliver the elastic energy. Important, yes, but the source of the velocity?
Last edited by XFactor
Gotta admit, I got lost in a lot of that technical stuff. Did I read that the arm plays no part in what?

There's another discussion going on about arm injuries and torque! Somebody please explain this further. The way I'm taking this, we shouldn't be having all these elbow problems.

Sorry, I'm stupid, probably didn't understand what was meant.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×