I have viewed hundreds of PG showcase evaluations with scores ranging from 5 to 10. However, with the exception of a small percentage of evaluations, simply by reading the report only, without looking at the velo and 60 time, it is hard to tell the difference between, for instance, between a 6 or an 8. Both could have, "contact hitter, stays inside ball well, aggressive", etc. I guess what I'm getting at is, would'nt the evaluations be more helpful if they listed the deficiencies instead of just pointing out good characteristics. Why not list the weakness??? (while there are a few which list weaknesses, most do not, and there are several which list a weakness and the player gets an 8). I mean, a lot of these reports say the same things with varying ratings. Please explain, any thoughts?
Original Post