ESPN reported that the Indians have picked up the option on Paul Byrd at $7,500,000.
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=3096927
Obviously he hasn't been found to have violated any MLB rules.
On the other hand, admitted he obtained and used HGH, on a prescription from a dentist, for a severe pituitary gland condition,without prior disclosure. Coincidentally, his prescriptions, to the extent known, stopped when HGH became a banned substance.
Is this a message that MLB does not care how you handle yourself off the field as long as you produce on the field?
Is this a message that MLB is much different than the NFL and you can play in spite of the "best interests in baseball" clause?
Is this contract a message that encourages what has been happening?
Is this a message that MLB will encourage off the field HGH use of the type encountered here, whether it be for Paul Byrd or any other player.
I am having some trouble finding a good message for everyone who is trying to stay clean. I am having trouble determining how or if this signing is good for baseball, at any level.
Original Post