It has come up at our high school and I was wondering how different programs operate around the country.
Background:
Our high school is a football school and makes no presumption to be anything else. An assistant football coach is the baseball head coach, and while he's a decent guy, I'm afraid the baseball program is substandard. (He thinks that baseball players should only play from Feb to July and then “rest” their arms the remainder of the year) To much favoritism, mainly toward football players, and some poor decisions on how the program is run is leading to a parent revolt. For example, if he likes a guy, a football guy, then that guy plays the position he wants to play, even if he leads the league in errors. (My son isn’t involved in this, “yet”, in case you think it sour apples on my part) It is generally accepted that there is enough talent at the school this year to compete for a state title, but based on the coaches history, it is expected that his decisions will keep that from happening (another example; last season, he played one of his “favorite” who cost the team 4 out of the first 5 games. The assistances almost had a revolt, so he gave in and made the changes they wanted, 9 game winning streak)
The parents, not sure if it is booster club endorsed at this time, are forming a committee to basically put the screws to the coach. He will be expected to play the “best” players, regardless of class, and win at higher percentage or they will get him replaced (their words).
I personally am, kinda, in the middle. I want the program run like a baseball program, not something to do while waiting for football to come around again. But, I see a few of the parents that are fanatics. They are as much, if not more, concerned about their kid getting exposure as seeing the program advance.
Do your schools have committees, or something like it, that help keep the program on track?
Original Post