Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by PGStaff:
A question?

Would Pujols be as good if he didn't finish his swing that way?


PGStaff, what in particular are you referencing regarding his finish? (Please be patient with my ignorance.)

I once read a thread on the sEtPr0 site by Ny-Man describing the swing as starting with a flail and extending into a whip. More than likely I do not fully grasp the concept but Pujols swing seems to match the flail extending into a whip concept.

When I first came across the idea, it made me think of the cue “Short to the ball and long on the follow threw.”
GFK,

The finish of the swing is all things that happen from contact on. Including the high finish.

The only reason I brought it up is because there has been discussion where people have said it does not matter what happens after contact. While this is probable true in a scientific way, I've never seen a good power hitter who doesn't appear to finish the swing with authority.
quote:
Originally posted by PGStaff:
GFK,

The finish of the swing is all things that happen from contact on. Including the high finish.

The only reason I brought it up is because there has been discussion where people have said it does not matter what happens after contact. While this is probable true in a scientific way, I've never seen a good power hitter who doesn't appear to finish the swing with authority.


I guess I tried to read to much into the question.

I do know that the finish on a hitter's swing is a result of all that takes place up to contact. I would bet good money you see similarities in the finish of good hitters because they are doing lots of things the same up to contact.

I guess you could use the finish to evaluate the swing to contact. If the finish is off, the swing up to contact must have been off.
quote:
Originally posted by Callaway:
PG

...I think that what happens after contact is a direct result of what happens before contact. While it may be true that what happens after contact may be irrelevant, the reality is that the finish was created by the start.


Callaway, you said it a lot better than I and in a lot less words!
I don't have the technical knowledge that many on this board have but here's what I see in Albert's video clip (or at least what I think I see)....

Albert's weight shift and perhaps the early part of his rotation appear to create momentum that drives into his left leg and left foot. I can't tell this for sure but it looks like this momentum recoils back up through his left leg to continue the hip rotation. He doesn't appear to squash the bug...doesn't appear to drive off his back foot at all.

I can't slow the video down any further but it looks like he pulls really hard with his front side/shoulder then throws the barrel at the ball with his right hand. Though it could be that what I see as throwing the barrel actually occurs after contact. Hard to tell at this speed.

His spine angle is pretty much vertical, which differs from many power hitters whose spine angles appear to tilt back toward the catcher a bit. This might be why Albert hits so many line drive home runs, as opposed to towering fly balls (which he hits only occasionally).

Perhaps some here can tell me if what I think I see is correct.

Thanks.
Jon
Because both hitters rotate around a firm front leg. Their hands tend to return to the plane they left. One hitting guru is teaching to flatten the finish. This would really be difficult. Go back and watch where Pujols and Ortiz hands are when the initiate and see if their hands return to the same plane.

If you built a machine and fixed the rotational axis point and started above and fed a swing lower than the starting point, it would finish on the same plane it started.
BlueDog,

In both the clips you provided the hips are moving forward (weight transfer in the general direction of the pitcher) before the front foot plants but it appears that hip rotation (opening) does not start until after the foot plants. I would agree that the ground is not the source of energy for the swing. The hitter pushes against the ground but his body is the source of energy.
ummm, if you think the rotation of the hips throws the foot to a plant on the ground, you are blind.

watch any of these clips and stop them at the landing of front hip.. then switch to watching hips, they happen at different times... foot then hips...

you are saying that when someone strides, that they DO NOT re-establish a balance point before they initiate hip rotation? THAT does not make sense. BLUEDOG- are you sure you took a biomechanics class in college?? If you are right, you could make a mint re-writing every college book on the Biomechanical Principles of Human Movement...

SO if I understand this right, the hips force the planting of the foot (downward transfer of energy) yet the arms, hands, bat are on a slight upslope through swing (upward transfer of energy)... so basically you have energy going in tow differnt directions at about the same time??? not very efficient.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×