quote:
Originally posted by biggerpapi:
What I might suggest is that we get rid of rules that are open to interpretation. For example, if a checked swing crosses the plate it's a strike.
There are a lot of those calls that are borderline, where you can't fault the ump one way or another, but it seems there is a high degree of consistency with regards to getting it right outside of the borderline.
Let me preface my next with, I am not trying to say these examples are the norm...but when Barrett tosses a catcher who is simply talking to him without showing him up, Marquez consistently escalates arguments and tries to show players up, Bucknor is rampantly imperfect with safe/out calls, both Mark Wegner and Brian Gorman eject pitchers without a warning (and Quintana didn't hit the batter when Wegner ejected him), that tells me that the policing of umpires is not reaching its full potential and more could be done.
With regards to showing up the ump, every ump has a line, different umps, different lines. Yeah, some fuses are too short, but if you did it, and it's against the rules, what it boils down to, is that you did it.
Funny think about Barrett though. I never got on an ump about his strike zone because I always figured, either he can see it or he can't, and if he can't, my riding him won't make him see it. But with Barrett, he was overwhelmingly awful the day he tossed AJ, and I'm not saying it was intentional, but everything the Detroit pitcher threw was a strike and everything the Sox pitcher threw wasn't, with no regard for a zone. But after he tossed AJ and Ventura, he actually called a good game. I've never seen that before, where an ump went from horrible to excellent in the middle of a game.