quote:Originally posted by troy99:
This brings to mind a question AGAIN. IP has brushed this aside in the past as unimportant.. our BI thinks otherwise. After contact..is there any value in getting "good extension". Or is this working against what you are teaching? The Rose clip is an example of none...but I see alot of MLB that do. Is this just "style"???
IMO, the key phrase in your question is, "After contact...". Do I think it is important to teach something that happens after contact? No, I personally don't. I think it is more important to teach what happens prior to contact. What happens after contact can be looked at to make sure the pre-contact stuff is correct. For example, if you see the bat finishing at the waist, you can tell the kid dropped his hands and disconnected.
I've heard instructors do this (our local batting cage has a 5-step approach that includes "extension"). It seems to me that "extension" is something that happens (a "non-teach"). Think of the early part of the swing as a merry-go-round. The bat builds up rotational force and flys off the merry-go-round into extension.
It also depends on the situation. For example, if you get a pitch over the middle and you time it so that you hit it just out in front of the plate, you'll have extension. If you have an inside pitch that you are slightly late on, you won't have much extension. Trying to tell a kid to "extend" after contact seems like it could lead to a disconnected swing (meaning the kid may conciously try to force the bat away from his body too early).
Joe