Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Pick a number between 0-8. Big Grin One would have to assume that the batter in the #1 hole would be the leadoff man more times than any other batter during the course of the season but that alone would be hard to prove. Too many unknowns.

rz1,
Logically the DH would have no bearing on the reoccurrence of the leadoff hitter because the number of batters remains constant at nine --- but you do bring up a good point. Batting averages by lineup positions WOULD have a bearing on the "cycle" rate of the batting order thus effecting the leadoff position.
Last edited by Fungo
Some of you guys might want to go over to Hardball Times and read this great article:

Constructing Line-ups

Here is a little blurb:
Your three best hitters should bat somewhere in the #1, #2 and #4 slots. Your fourth- and fifth-best hitters should occupy the #3 and #5 slots. The #1 and #2 slots will have players with more walks than those in the #4 and #5 slots. From slot #6 through #9, put the players in descending order of quality.
Last edited by Chill
quote:
Logically the DH would have no bearing on the reoccurrence of the leadoff hitter because the number of batters remains constant at nine --- but you do bring up a good point. Batting averages by lineup positions WOULD have a bearing on the "cycle" rate of the batting order thus effecting the leadoff position.


Fungo,
That's what I was thinking but could not put it into words, you are a wordsmith clever.

In other words if the pitcher is in the 9 hole with 2 outs there is an X% better chance the #1 would lead off the next inning than in the dh world where the #9 guy would have a better average. This can then be carried even further that a team with 2 outs and runners in scoring position would pitch around the #8 hitter to get to the #9 pitcher who statistically would make more 3rd outs.

I would venture that NL leadoff hitters lead off innings quiet a bit more than the AL leadoffs.
Last edited by rz1
Midlo dad is right. A plate appearance is just as it says ---- an appearance at the plate and is not necessarily an AB. No at bat (AB) shall be charged against a player when (i) He hits a sacrifice bunt or sacrifice fly (ii) He is awarded first base on four called balls (iii) He is hit by a pitched ball (iv) He is awarded first base because of interference or obstruction.
quote:
The first batter in the order will have the most at bats (or be tied for most at bats).


WillieBobo,
WRONG!
Did you know if your leadoff batter went to the plate five times in a game and was walked the first time, was hit by pitch the second time, and laid down a sac bunt the third time, and the catcher interfered with his swing the fourth time and he sac flied the fifth time that he did NOT have an at bat during that game? He was 0 for 0 with 1 RBI.
Fungo

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×