jemaz,
Your assumption seems to be that “can” is the same thing as “will”.
Aside from that, I’d like to discuss how the notion that its somehow easier to catch a ball thrown easy than one thrown “normally”. I’m not talking about “abnormally” hard throws from abnormally short distances, but rather normal distance throws at normal velocities. Just like a curve ball is more difficult to hit than a FB, an arcing throw is more difficult to catch than one with much less arc on it. The reason is, its easier to determine where the ball will be in order to catch it.
It’s the same thing with ground balls. It’s a lot more difficult to field a grounder that’s moving relatively slowly because its much more subject to being affected by outside forces. And, its much easier to field a ball off to one side or the other than one directly at a fielder because its easier to get a good read on velocity. Think of it as what the hardest ball for an OF’r to catch. A liner directly at them, or one off to one side or the other?
<input id="mac_address" type="hidden" value="" />
I don't think it is about being easier to catch one ball or the other. It is about the damage which could be done by the stronger player or the hard ground ball. Back when I was a kid, my good friend was a top baseball player. He threw the ball hard to a kid, who looked like he could catch. Well, he caught it. Fingers up, glove out in front - a real standard catch. And then his entire hand, glove and ball proceeded to hit him in the face and bloody his nose, lips, and everything else.