If you have a player who is hitting well and you "think' you see a flaw in his swing do you try to change him.
I am a "if it ain't broke don't mess with it" kind of guy
How about you?
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by TRhit:
If you have a player who is hitting well and you "think' you see a flaw in his swing do you try to change him.
I am a "if it ain't broke don't mess with it" kind of guy
How about you?
quote:Ditto! Only thing would be if he got in a mini slump, that would be the first thing I would do to try to fix it.
quote:but I have not tried it yet.
quote:Originally posted by PGStaff:
That said, I do think there are too many times a player is changed when it’s not a necessity. This even happens in pro ball some times. The hitter becomes uncomfortable and his performance can suffer. To me, the very best instructors are those who can make changes and adjustments while allowing the player to be comfortable with those changes. The better the player the quicker these adjustments take place.
quote:The better the player the quicker these adjustments take place.
quote:Sometimes it isn't 'what' one teaches, but 'when' they teach it.
quote:What benefit would a Little League batter gain if he has a major league swing at his level of play?
The best amateur hitters of any age that we see are often the ones with the best most advanced swing.
What adjustments would be there to make when the level of competition increases?
In a perfect world the less adjustment needed the better.
How does a fine tuned swing for a 70 mph pitch adjust to high 80's or 90's?
Major League hitters do this every day. They take BP and then go hit in the game with the same swing.
If raw talent and natural ability is enough to excell, why tamper with anything?
Because it takes more than just raw talent and natural ability to hit MLB pitching. Those with the raw talent just have an advantage and then they often get passed by the guys who have learned how to hit ie. Pete Rose. Not that Rose didn't have natural ability, it's just that others who couldn't do what he did had more.
quote:What adjustments would be there to make when the level of competition increases?
quote:Many Coaches and instructors spend a career teaching anything, and everything, but that, unfortunately....
quote:Originally posted September 05, 2005 by PGStaff:
Much of what we learn comes from personal experiences. For what it’s worth, here is one of my lessens learned. This has to do with the theory of if they are hitting well, leave them alone.
My second son was a three time all state high school player. He holds all the hitting records, batting ave, home runs, rbi, hits, doubles, etc at his former high school. From a production stand point he did everything possible. In college he hit over .400, leading the team in hrs, rbi, etc. He managed all the success without much help from me as I was on the road so much.
Despite all this success, I saw some flaws in his swing. I didn’t change a thing because it was fun with him having so much success. I figured “if it aint broke, don’t try to fix it!” I was afraid I might change things and destroy this success. His high school and college coaches didn’t change a thing either, for much of the same reasons.
Long story short: I was right about the flaws and wrong not to help him correct them. In fact, a crosschecker friend saw him in college and told me after seeing him hit a long home run and a double… “Jerry, I don’t think he will hit unless he makes some adjustments” If it were someone other than my son I would have thought the same thing.
In pro ball he struggled tremendously. He hit with power, but the better ,day in and day out, pitching ended up eating him up. His hitting coaches tried hard to change him, but he had formed some long lasting habits. The things they tried to change were the very same things I had noticed years before. And the exact same things that the crosschecker saw.
Point is: Success at one level does not automatically mean success at the next level. The earlier a young player learns and the more correct technique is practiced, the better the chance for success later on.
quote:Originally posted by noreast:
Its, you also seem to never miss an opportunity to attack BlueDog and Chameleon.
OK, so let's say that what they say now is different from what they said a few years ago.
Instead of critiquing the messengers, critique their messege. Isn't their willingness to progress in advancing toward better teaching a good thing. In other words, are they offering better advice than they did in the past? What is your take on their philosophy, as it stands today? Today, not three years ago.