Skip to main content

I'm tired of ex-mlb players not knowing how to teach the fundamentals. This is an ex 10 year mlb vet (major league vet, not minors) teaching the wrong hitting mechanics. At the end of the video, he states "the hands lead the hips, and it is wrong for the hips to lead the hands." Video below.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oRrTIoI_pU

This is wrong, and John Mallee (finalist for the Texas Ranger hitting coach - replace Jaramillo)states the correct process of the swing. Video evidence provided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA_PK6JPg9Y
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Bear:
By "working together" do you mean that the hips and hands start at the same time?

Isn't that the question here? Whether the hips start before the hands, or the hands start before the hips.

"Working together" is vague and ill-defined. I could argue that the hips and hands could be working together whether the hands go first or the hips go first.

So are you saying that they should start at the same time?

I find this a very interesing issue. I'm no hitting expert or even particularly knowledgable about hitting mechanincs, so I am a good layperson to ask clarifiying questions about stuff that gets bogged down in jargon.

Sam1234 posted two videos with distinctly contrary views as to whether hips go forst or hands go first. The second video goes so far as to say that hips first is an "absolute" to good hitting.

So my question is more or less one that could be empirically answered: do the overwhelming majority of good hitters fire hips before hands or hands before hips?

Or is this not an absolute at all, which means empirical evidence would show good hitters doing it both ways.

I think this is interesting, because unlike a lot of other p**sing contests on the hitting forum, this one could actually be empirically proven, seems to me.
One other thing - question for sam1234 -

I played back the John Mallee video a few times. Right at initiation of the swing, where he says the swing should be from the "ground up, foot, knee, hips, hands last" -

Guess what the video shows? The hitter's knee and hips start moving exactly at the same time the hands start moving!

Play it back yourself! Either this hitter is not a good example of what Mallee is trying to say is an absolute, or it actually isn't really an absolute.

Looks to me like this hitter starts his hands at the same time as the back knee and hip, just like it seem Bear is arguing.

Thoughts?
I can't watch youtube videos at school so I can't comment on them. I will try to remember them when I get home and check them out then. But I would like to comment on Rob's questions / comments with my philosophy.

I'm a "swing from the ground up" guy and that's what I teach. But I also believe that the separation of movements is so minute that it really a non-issue if the hands move when the feet move at same time. I teach it more from a generating power point of view.

Which is stronger - legs or arms? I teach my guys to think bottom up because the bigger / stronger parts of the body will get the smaller / not as strong (because you don't want weak) parts of the body moving.

Another aspect which I teach to build upon the generating power aspect is that really the whole body is connected. Therefore the hands are connected to the feet which are connected to the hips. Think of it like there is a chain with no slack in it connected all the parts of the body. When one part moves the rest of the body has to move. So after trigger / stride (whatever you want to call it) anything that happens creates the whole body movement. If you want to start the hands then the hips and feet need to start moving. If you want to start the hips then the hands and feet better be moving as well. If you want to start the feet then the hips and hands better be moving too.

You can say "separate this and that" or "start this and that" but if you have a good swing then it looks like all the parts are working together at the same time. Slumps or bad at bats come from one aspect of the swing being a little too fast or a little too slow.

I also agree this can be a great topic with great discussion as long as it doesn't turn into who has the biggest nose competition. I rarely come to the hitting forum because I hate trying to explain what I teach (and know how successful it is) just to have someone tell me how dumb I am because I don't teach it their way. TRHit said it best in his response - there is more than one way to be a good hitter. I'll just add to his sentiment that there is more than one way to be a good ANYTHING.
Rob Ellis teaches the hands lead the hips (The Mike Schmidt Study). Says the swing is slow with the opposite key. I agree they are usually simultaneous.

That is not important though. The hitter who believes the hands lead the swing may put himself in a better position to hit. I would never correct a major league hitter of 10 years on that point.

A hitter who has a dead lower body may need to be told the lower body leads the swing.

When you hit, you really don't think about either. This would be more of practice keys anyway. I've never seen a sport that demands absolutes that don't seem to exist like baseball.

Here are my absolutes to hitting.
1. Player must not be seated nor standing on his hands.
2. He must use an approved bat.
3. To keep hitting in any league (except little league, etc.) he must make some contact.
4. Mass x velocity has something to do with hitting far.
quote:
Mass x velocity-SQUARED has something to do with hitting far.


Corrected it for you!

Some time back, someone posted a thread about the coach who "fixed" the swings of Carew, Musial, and several other HOF guys who had approaches that would be pooh-poohed by gurus today. It was a hoot.

I think fundamentals are especially needed by those of us who are mere mortals in terms of our athleticism -- we cannot succeed without perfecting technique. But there are super humans out there who hit despite developing cranky habits, and to them, any departure is a case of messing with success, which they wouldn't do.

I also think that the basics of eye-hand coordination improve with repetition. Thus, a guy who has what some might think is a bad swing can often have success if he just practices it enough. In the final analysis, it's all about putting the sweet spot on the ball.
quote:
Originally posted by baseballpapa:
Rob Ellis teaches the hands lead the hips...


I never could quite understand how Ellis and Schmidt got connected.

Sure, it may have been thru baseball, but jeez, we are speaking about a HoF who pretty much drastically tweaked his approach to the plate, almost yearly.

As compared to an intense first round guy, who never left the yard in the bigs, and had a career .229 BA, yet he got there (yet for three years, not ten as mis-stated)!

I think you may have mis-interpreted what Ellis was trying to say.

Bottom Line: In many many circles, the lower half starts before the upper half. But then again, to reach some type of understanding, terms must be precise, understood by many, & agreed to for comprehensive.

I am not interested in a pe^ing approach/contest, at least not before the Flomax kicks in.
Last edited by Bear
Rob,

The back knee piches in before the hands begin to start forward. That is what John is talking about.

John Mallee is a finalist to replace Rudy as the Texas Rangers hitting coach. That is why I put his video up. He knows his stuff.

I get tired of people saying, that just because this person played in the bigs, he knows his stuff. He was talented, but some ex-big leaguers, "just did it." They didn't understand the workings of the swing. They just had a great natural ability to hit a baseball. It is far different to be a great teacher, than just a great hitter.

Below is a link to a slide show of Albert Pujoles. Look at slides 11 - 13. These show clearly, the hips leading the hands.

http://www.chrisoleary.com/pro...HomeRunSwing_001.pdf
One of the greatest hitting teachers in the game, also happened to be one of the greatest hitters in the game.

Another great hitting teacher also had his own hitting absolutes.

And yes, Rudy has been and will continue to be a pretty good hitting teacher.

Bottom Line: I like Chris O'Leary's reports. On both pitching and hitting. On Pujols I observe different things then your conclusions.

I see Pujols lower half leading his upper half. (slide 1 thru 10).
I also observe some hand movement beginning in slide 8.

I also see this terrific hitter having his hips and hands work together, thru contact and follow thru.

QED

Hip Bones Connected to the Back Bone Let's all sit by the fire, sing cum-bay-ya, drink and eat
Last edited by Bear
When I was in high school I worked with a hitting coach who numerous professional hitters seek advice from for their swings and he taught me 4 things:
1. Before you can hit you have to load
2. Get your foot down early (earlier is better than later to allow you to read the pitch)
3. Your body should move like it does in a golf swing
a. you start back and you move to the ball
b. once you begin to swing your hips rotate
4. Always keep your hands inside of the ball (hit the middle to left part of the baseball; even on inside pitches)

It helped me a lot as hitter and I learned more from him in 2 years than anyone else all my life.
He wasn't referring to the stride, but the movement of the body from the loaded position moving towards the baseball to hit. Simply stating not to just sit on the back side and turn hips and use your hands but to get the entire body into the swing. I believe there is only one guy that I know of in MLB that sits on his back side the entire time to hit and that is Tex.
quote:
Originally posted by sam1234:
I'm tired of ex-mlb players not knowing how to teach the fundamentals. This is an ex 10 year mlb vet (major league vet, not minors) teaching the wrong hitting mechanics. At the end of the video, he states "the hands lead the hips, and it is wrong for the hips to lead the hands." Video below.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5oRrTIoI_pU

This is wrong, and John Mallee (finalist for the Texas Ranger hitting coach - replace Jaramillo)states the correct process of the swing. Video evidence provided.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA_PK6JPg9Y




Yep! No clue!
You will find the same thing with pitching coaches. Just because they played in MLB does not mean they know how to teach. Buyer beware.

The absolute best hitting coach my son has ever had did not play a day beyond High School. He is however a perfectionist, detailed, uses video, knows how to communicate, and studies hitters like no one I have ever met. He has also read just about everything on hitting.
If you lead by opening your hips or front shoulder, you'll never get your weight behind the ball in your swing (power). Will work for contact hitters.

If you lean your hips/shoulders into the swing/contact location, your weight will follow and also allow good balance for hip turn.

The mental cues I use are

1) Front shoulder to the ball
2) Swing (short to zone, good extension)
3) Hip turn
4) Follow through

Depending on the individual, the stride/weight shift will vary.

The Mallee video has a pronounced 'long to the zone' swing in my opinion.
Last edited by Quincy
The baseball swing would be an example of angular accelleration.

The hip turn in the same direction of the swing would increase velocity or bat speed.

The force generated is from center to affect the revolving bat head.

the Momentum examples work with rotating bodies being affected by a torque or a force being generated to center. (Spinning Top)
Trillion,

The weight shifts from the back to the front with minimal head movement. The head can move towards the ball until the front heal (not foot) goes down. Rotation phase happens and the weight is transferred through and not around the core (spin hitter).

Since there are two feet that movement is linear on the bottom (there are two points). A leg kick hitter or any hitter who lifts the front foot at any phase of the swing has to have all weight on the back foot. When the swing is finished, you are correct, the weight transfers to the front foot. Most power is rotationally generated but this linear transfer is an important factor.

What doesn't work is "squish the bug." This creates friction and movement around and not through the core.

Henry Aaron's back foot was often off the ground when he hit. He had tremendous transfer and power. Most of the power in a swing is not in the lower but in the upper body -- this is not arguable but some will anyway. Aaron had great wrists which is the same as saying he had good forearms and triceps.

I am not saying lower body is not important. It is an important part of the chain and puts the hands in a position to rip through the ball. It is the difference between warning track and home run power, or the difference between getting a ground ball through the infield or hitting into a ground-out.

The best key I have found is not to emphasize the feet. I tell my hitters to drive their back knee under their head. This accomplishes two things. One, the head will center during rotational phase and will not drift forward. Two, the necessary lower rotation will get the hitter in the proper place to get maximum use of his upper body.

Hope this helps.
quote:
If you watch the back foot of the best MLB hitters - they are either on the tip of their back foot or the back foot is completely off the ground. What causes this? Where is the weight??


It's not a mystery.....Look at the above clips.....

The knee begins turning in toward the pitcher when the hands are going back.....The back heel lifts and the foot rolls up on the toe to allow this to happen....This is how torque is created in the middle, the core.....

When the back hip thrusts forward and upward to begin the forward swing, the foot can be pulled forward...I say can, because, some hitters lean back more than others during the forward swing phase and their foot is not pulled forward as much as some who don't lean back as much....
quote:
When the back hip thrusts forward and upward


Bluedog,
Glad you're back here posting.
I hate to get back into the hitting disussions, but could you explain what you mean by "upward". I was always under the impression that the hips (belt buckle) needed to stay level. I'm talking about the belt buckle staying close to parellel to the ground from beginning thru contact. Do you agree with that?
Guess it's just what one sees... I see the belt buckle staying level until contact. To raise the belt buckle would take raising the legs. Most hitting experts would say that is a no-no. It is better to actually lower the path of the belt buckle, rather than raise it, to keep the legs involved. Raising would eliminate the legs and make hitting an off speed pitch very difficult. JMO, but it is shared by others.
Bluedog,

Would you call Don Slaught an expert?

Check some video of this year's American League MVP.

Here's another guy that's a pretty "great" hitter.Ramirez

Just as in some of your video clips, I only see the belt buckle raise at or after contact, not before.

My only question was regarding what you said here...
quote:
When the back hip thrusts forward and upward to begin the forward swing

What's with the "old" most hitting experts are incompetent statement. Is it only the non experts who know anything? How does anyone learn anything if all the experts are incompetent? How did anyone become a great hitter? If it happens just naturally, there's no need to even discuss hitting theory.

I respect your opinions, but you show no respect for those who are considered experts by most everyone in baseball, while at the same time try to explain how someone should hit.

If you don't know Don Slaught, call RightView Pro and talk to him sometime. I think you will be surprised. He will not only tell you how it's done, but he will tell you why it is done that way. You might even learn something. Isn't that what all us students of the game desire?
quote:
I respect your opinions,.....


PG, no you don't....

quote:
you show no respect for those who are considered experts by most everyone in baseball,


Now, this is true....

quote:
It is better to actually lower the path of the belt buckle, rather than raise it,....


You can't show one clip of any great hitter doing this...I guarantee it.... Wink
Last edited by BlueDog
quote:
You can't show one clip of any great hitter doing this...I guarantee it....

Already did, go back and look closely at the link (Ramirez) in the other post. Maybe it's possible we are talking about different things here. I'm onlu going by your original description in the earlier post.

Raising the belt buckle or hips at the beginning of the swing, gets rid of the legs for any type of off speed pitch. It simply eliminates the ability to adjust! That is my opinion, until someone convinces me otherwise. In fact, it is a red flag when we see a good prospect doing this. Taught and explained by Don Slaught!

There's a difference between respect and agreement.
quote:
I'm talking about the belt buckle staying close to parellel to the ground from beginning thru contact.


That is your statement, PG......And, that is not what is happening in Manny's swing...

Manny is thrusting his rear hip forward and upward...There is no mistaking it....If I put my arrow on Manny's belt buckle and leave it there, the arrow will end up below his belt buckle.....



Last edited by BlueDog
quote:
Raising the belt buckle or hips at the beginning of the swing, gets rid of the legs for any type of off speed pitch. It simply eliminates the ability to adjust!


PG, the adjustment for offspeed does not come from the legs, regardless of what you and the other experts think....

But, enough arguing with you....I answered the posters's question....Hopefully, he learned something....
Last edited by BlueDog
Bluedog,

In the clips of Bonds and Ruth you provided above. Put your arrow on their belt buckle at the start and see if the buckle goes up or down at the beginning of their swing.

The legs or "BASE" are critical in being able to adjust to off speed. Once the base is committed too early it's nearly impossible to hit off speed.

Not saying that is the only adjustment, just an important ingredient.

What I see is the first movement of the belt buckle is either somewhat level with the starting point (of the belt buckle) or moving down in nearly every great hitter that hasn't been fooled on a pitch. My original comment was regarding this that you posted.

quote:
When the back hip thrusts forward and upward to begin the forward swing

Maybe I didn't understand correctly what you meant. It wouldn't be the first time.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×