Not a good start to the new year for this guy.
Florida star in trouble
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by redbird5:
c) There were 4 girls and 3 guys. Doesn't make sense to me.
quote:Originally posted by hokieone:
Absolutely innocent until proven guilty...
I hope the media doesn't convict the kid before a trial.
quote:Originally posted by BlueDog:
This young man has some immorality issues to change, that's for sure....
quote:Originally posted by CPLZ:quote:Originally posted by BlueDog:
This young man has some immorality issues to change, that's for sure....
Ahhh, a stone thrower.
I've always found the baseline for morality, just as it is for ethics, to be just where the issuer wants it to be so that they are shown in the best light and the person they are vilifying is beneath the sliding threshold. Sliding scale arguments, especially those fraught with interpretive value, like the bible, rarely have any basis in true societal issues, only in the arguers puritanical and accusatory mind.
quote:Originally posted by hokieone:
If you stay away from places where trouble can happen, you greatly increase your chances of staying away from trouble.
quote:I don't accept CPLZ's assertion that only self righteous puritans could find moral implications to 5 guys having *** with two girls
quote:Originally posted by playfair:
All 7 share responsibility for the awfulness of it.
quote:Ahhh, a stone thrower.
I've always found the baseline for morality, just as it is for ethics, to be just where the issuer wants it to be so that they are shown in the best light and the person they are vilifying is beneath the sliding threshold. Sliding scale arguments, especially those fraught with interpretive value, like the bible, rarely have any basis in true societal issues, only in the arguers puritanical and accusatory mind.
quote:Originally posted by BlueDog:quote:Ahhh, a stone thrower.
I've always found the baseline for morality, just as it is for ethics, to be just where the issuer wants it to be so that they are shown in the best light and the person they are vilifying is beneath the sliding threshold. Sliding scale arguments, especially those fraught with interpretive value, like the bible, rarely have any basis in true societal issues, only in the arguers puritanical and accusatory mind.
What's peculiar about these kind of false reasonings is that this person attacks the Bible and tries to reason that societal values overrule the Bible in these situations....
Easy to see this issuer is placing the baseline for morality just where he/she wants it to be.....
Also, those who attack the Bible are quick to talk about throwing stones while their Bible illiteracy doesn't allow them the knowledge of the Bible message of throwing stones....