Inviting comments to this scenario.
In my kid's 7u Little League, pitchers are subject to pitch counts and mandated days of rest. This is appropriate and fair enough, but there still can be an ethical/pick-your-poison dilemma, which occurred as follows.
My kid's team was in the Saturday semifinal as the second seed in a four team playoff, with the x factor being the championship game was scheduled for Sunday. That scheduling meant pitchers were subject to a 20 pitch limit if they were going to be eligible the next day. The team had 3 good and several not so good pitchers, and all of them did an inning.
But instead of abiding by that course, the number three seed spent its 3 best pitchers up to the legal maxes just to beat my son's team, playing it like it was the World Series, and so it won the semifinal against my son's team's weaker guys. Of course, No. 3's best guys were all ineligible for the final, and it had nobody to pitch and was expectedly thrashed.
I think this managing, legal but not exactly cricket either, effort to win at the cost of having no possibility in the final, was was over-the-top, and not really a good example for the kids.
Appreciate any thoughts about winning by pulling out all of the stops.
Original Post