Skip to main content

On another thread, it was noted that Chris Handke, a D3 pitcher, was drafted. Chris was 6' 3" and 235 who threw app 10 innings in his draft year hitting between 85 - 88. He was pretty wild in college. After the collegiate season, and very quickly, he raised his velo to 93.

Why didn't he get that velo in college? Since most college players have at least a dream of continuing their baseball careers into pro ball, isnt the quality of pitching coach at least a consideration for a player in choosing a program? What is the quality of pitching coaches in college?
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Expanding on the topic: How do you know what is a good pitching coach? What separates a great one from the rest of the pack? (For example, some of the college pc's i know, have philosophies that are specifically designed for metal bat play -- they tend to focus on the outside of the plate -- and dont really throw inside (essentially conceding the inside to the batter). (Before anyone goes on to say that that approach is a losing one, the program is a d1 power which has been very successful -- especially for a private school.)
There are also coaches who oversue pitchers. A friend pointed out every first round pick from a certain powerhouse over a period of years had surgery within a year of turning pro. Pitching recruits find out about coaches by discussing philosophy with them, reputation and word of mouth.
Last edited by RJM
Goosegg: (nice screen name BTW)

This is a very interesting subject for pitchers and those looking at pitching coaches and colleges.

To answer your question one that can communicate effectively with the student and transfer his knowledge effectively. I am not going to get into pitching philosophy or this thread will convert into Tom House vs. Mike Marshall smack down.

My son has had maybe 10 different coaches over the years. He has got positive information from each of them. He has also received “bad teaches” from some of them and because of this I think it is important to be a student of the craft you are learning and continually see what the current thought is on a particular area. A “current” coach would not teach stuff that was taught 20 or even 10 years ago today. So the other thing that is important is to find a coach that is looking to continually improve himself and stay current in his craft.

As far as good pitching coaches at colleges, I think you need to do research into a giving college and formulate your own opinion. There are just too many programs out there to broad-brush good or bad pitching coaches. As RJM pointed out talk to them ask questions.

Regarding Handke, kids develop at different rates, my experience is that tall kids develop slower than shorter ones. Everyone assumes a 6’5” kid is going to throw hard, and well they might, but IMO they tend to peak later than others. This is why you hear the term “projectable” so often with taller kids.

I don’t know the Handke story but I would guess that he took awhile to fill into his frame and it appears he was a multi sport athlete. He was with a D3 program, and he may have not had much individual attention, that together with being multi-sport and maybe a little tall and not a go to guy for the team, he did not develop. Maybe the D3 program did not have a real good pitching coach. Don’t really know.

I suspect he is just now filling into his body and is now receiving some good coaching and all of a sudden it has clicked with him and he is getting it together. Great for him and great for the team that drafted him at 1237.
Most college P coaches are not paid. Many of them have little or no pitching knowledge. What is most concerning is that they don't know what to look for and to correct. My son had 4 different PCs over 4 years. I recently found out he had been pitching injured for the last 2+ years in college. He wouldn't say anything for fear of losing his scholarship.
I just received the results of an injury study on college pitchers that my son participated in. This was a study put on by UNC Chapel hill. The scary thing was that 50% of college pitchers in the study pitched when they had sore arms . That included shoulder and elbow pain to the extent they had to take pain relievers.
One of the reason MiLB pitchers have surgery is that they are checked for problems by team medical staff. Things that went undetected are now exposed..
Last edited by BobbleheadDoll
quote:
Originally posted by Goosegg:
Expanding on the topic: How do you know what is a good pitching coach? What separates a great one from the rest of the pack? (For example, some of the college pc's i know, have philosophies that are specifically designed for metal bat play -- they tend to focus on the outside of the plate -- and dont really throw inside (essentially conceding the inside to the batter). (Before anyone goes on to say that that approach is a losing one, the program is a d1 power which has been very successful -- especially for a private school.)


Good topic.
Huge reason son went out of state was to work with Kevin O'Sullivan, who I really didn't know much about until we began our homework. It was a good choice, not only did he work consistantly on refining son's mechanics, he prepared him for the college game as well as for the professional game.

I realize that not everyone has the opportunity to work under such a knowledgeable coach, but for a player who will be pitcher only who wishes to reach the next level, this is very important in the consideration of where you might want to spend your next 3-4 years, you do not need to work under an A+ pitching coach but you need to watch for pitcher abuse and know that the pitching coach is minding the pitchers, who knows them better than anyone. In 3 years he was only allowed once to pitch a complete game, but most likely could have had more. That's the way he manages his pitchers and that's important for later on, JMO. Unfortunetly son has had some issues, but it is not from overuse.

My son has a friend in his organization that was a first rounder, attended Baylor and he was the workhorse during their run for Omaha that year (also his draft year in 2005 hitting close to 100mph). He has had 3 operations since being drafted and possibly never play the game again.

BHD,
I am not sure where you get the fact that most college p coaches are not paid. Not sure if you can blame your son's injury on the program he attended and 4 different p coaches, he didn't throw enough innings to consider overuse. And it is every pitchers responsibility to tell their coaches or managers that they are hurt. You don't lose your scholarship over injury, you can lose it by just not getting the job done and if you are hurt and hide it, you only see more bench time than playing time. I also have to tell you that the coaches and medical staff at son's college were just as attentive if not more than in pro ball. In college you have an issue you are off to the doctor that day, or next, in milb, you have to wait for the organization to decide what they want to do, and this can take time.
Last edited by TPM
quote:
Originally posted by BobbleheadDoll:
Most college P coaches are not paid. Many of them have little or no pitching knowledge. What is most concerning is that they don't know what to look for and to correct. My son had 4 different PCs over 4 years. I recently found out he had been pitching injured for the last 2+ years in college. He wouldn't say anything for fear of losing his scholarship.


No, you did not say he was overused..in college anyway, but seems that you are making reference that since he had 4 different p coaches who didn't know what they were doing, but if son was hurt and didn't say anything how were they to know? How can you make corrections when one is injured.

To be honest with you, I don't know of any pitchers who got worse going to college, overused yes, but not worse in skills and ability.

Can you provide a list of programs, especially in D1, where coaches don't get paid.
Last edited by TPM
quote:
Many of them have little or no pitching knowledge. What is most concerning is that they don't know what to look for and to correct. My son had 4 different PCs over 4 years. I recently found out he had been pitching injured for the last 2+ years in college. He wouldn't say anything for fear of losing his scholarship.


BHD,
I just don't get you.
On another thread, and many before that, you post/boast about your getting your son a "max" scholarship.
Now, in this thread clearly assert the lack of knowledge of those coaches injured your son's arm.
If both are true, it seems that you did not do your due diligence.
From what you are posting, you negotiated the scholarship.
You negotiated what you wanted for your son.
You required the big schollie from a coaching staff and now state those coaches were not skilled enough to coach effectively at college baseball. In fact, you clearly state their lack of skills caused your son to be injured for 2 years.
Looks like you put money first and let your son take the risk and consequences of that decision.
It is to his credit he did so well academically.
TPM he had a great P coach in his freshman and Sr year. The 2 in the middle were terrible as far as catching the mechanical issues. He did complain about a minor discomfort in his shoulder near the end of his soph year but said it felt okay after throwing a bit. He and another LHP led the team in ERA and he led the team in OBA until a few games at the end of the season. The other LHP had TJ surgery last year.
I asked him why he didn't talk to the coaches and he said they didn't think it was anything serious. He is not the type to make a fuss. About a month before the end of his SR year he told his Mom his shoulder was really hurting and he hoped it would hold up until he was done.
I can't explain why he did that. It still bothers him a little .
quote:
I said BB wasn't that important to us in our decision.


In the DIII thread, you posted how the maximum amount of the scholarship was so important.
With that thread saying you wanted the biggest baseball scholarship you could negotiate, and this one saying baseball was "not that important to us," that probably says about all that needs to be said, in my view.
quote:
Originally posted by BobbleheadDoll:
TPM he had a great P coach in his freshman and Sr year. The 2 in the middle were terrible as far as catching the mechanical issues. He did complain about a minor discomfort in his shoulder near the end of his soph year but said it felt okay after throwing a bit. He and another LHP led the team in ERA and he led the team in OBA until a few games at the end of the season. The other LHP had TJ surgery last year.
I asked him why he didn't talk to the coaches and he said they didn't think it was anything serious. He is not the type to make a fuss. About a month before the end of his SR year he told his Mom his shoulder was really hurting and he hoped it would hold up until he was done.
I can't explain why he did that. It still bothers him a little .


Oh, so he didn't have an injury? Or he did? He had it for two years of just at the end? What is it?
He led the team in ERA?
I am not sure you realize how much harm your above implication can do to hurt a program.
How hurt could he have been if he didn't ask to have it checked out, coaches are not doctors, they send their players to the team doctor when a player has an issue. Why didn't he let you know? I am sure you wouold have advised him to get a docs opinion.
quote:
Originally posted by BobbleheadDoll:
I know you have an issue with what I have said. That is your problem.
i have always said that we went for max scholarship or my son stayed here . College here is a quarter of what you pay in the US. Simple economics.
I don't give a **** what you think.


Yes, you have said that you went for the money, you advise parents to go for the most money, but that is NOT good advice, a good example of why is because of what posted above about your son.

I am not really sure what happened to your son is relevant to this topic anyway.
quote:
That is your problem.


No, it isn't.
You are on this site throwing a group of coaches under the bus and saying their lack of skill caused your son to be hurt for 2 years. You are the one suggesting the coaches who gave the big scholarship created an environment where your son could not say anything for fear of losing his scholarship, but yet in other threads say they increased his scholarship both his junior and senior year.
Saying I wanted and negotiated the maximum scholarship for my son, but "baseball wasn't important for us" clearly says there was a problem. It isn't mine. It isn't the coaches who gave the big scholarship.
My bet is you never told them 'baseball wasn't important for us" when you negotiated the big scholarship. .
In fact, baseball and being successful was the way those coaches tried to make a living. It meant everything to them. When they were not successful, they got fired.
Nope, that isn't my problem,at all.
Last edited by infielddad
quote:
Yes, you have said that you went for the money, you advise parents to go for the most money, but that is NOT good advice, a good example of why is because of what posted above about your son.

I am not really sure what happened to your son is relevant to this topic anyway


Isn't this thread about P coaches ?
Not good advice ? Well if our focus was on academics and not pro ball which 90% of the posters will be facing , it is a reasonable advice. Many of my son's teammates owe over $70,000 after 4 years.
I am finished explaining to you 2 Neanderthals who are just trying to be ignorant.
The coaches got fired for just causes. In fact 2 players were leaving until they heard the coaches were going. At the end of the soph year 13 SRs graduated and wrote derogatory exit letters about the coaches.
The 1st 5 guys told the coach at the exit meeting they weren't coming back at the end of my son's JR year. My son was the 6th and the only one who said he was coming back. I felt sorry for him but it was clear he had to go.
You may not think it is nice to talk about this but it is reality and it goes on all over the country.
Many programs go though coaching changes, usually because the coach they have replaced has left for a better opportunity, there are VERY few coaches that actually get fired because they do poor jobs. You will always hear about the big conference guys getting the boot, but usually they are good coaches, but not given enough time to turn around programs.

There are many parents of players who post here whose sons have gone through coaching changes, yet they managed to survive and did well.

I agree the program your son attended may have had issues, all programs have issues, but your son seems to have more than most, for some reason or another. I agree with infielddad, you can't talk out of one side of your mouth, it was all about the money, then blame coaches for a possible injury when you let everyone think you called the shots in your sons recruiting. How can you say it wasn't about bb? Of course it was, that's why your son got a scholarship!

My comment on overuse BTW, was that if your son was overused (which he wasn't) by all means blast the coaches.
quote:
Originally posted by BobbleheadDoll:
I am finished explaining to you 2 Neanderthals who are just trying to be ignorant.
The coaches got fired for just causes. In fact 2 players were leaving until they heard the coaches were going. At the end of the soph year 13 SRs graduated and wrote derogatory exit letters about the coaches.
The 1st 5 guys told the coach at the exit meeting they weren't coming back at the end of my son's JR year. My son was the 6th and the only one who said he was coming back. I felt sorry for him but it was clear he had to go.
You may not think it is nice to talk about this but it is reality and it goes on all over the country.


What does that have to do with an injury your son never said anything about?

I won't speak for my intelligance or lack of, but in no way do I or anyone else here think that infielddad is ignorant.
quote:
The coaches got fired for just causes. In fact 2 players were leaving until they heard the coaches were going. At the end of the soph year 13 SRs graduated and wrote derogatory exit letters about the coaches.


Like I said, these coaches worked with you to provide the maximum scholarship for your son.
You state on this site that baseball was not important for "us."
If it feels right for you to throw those coaches under the bus, that says a lot.
Since those coaches provided, based on a video and your continued negotiations with them, a large scholarship, when baseball was not important "for us," that says even more.
Your posts in this thread could well be a reason many college coaches are forced to treat things like a business.
It sure appears you did and used the maximum caveat emptor, buyer beware, since baseball was "not that important to us," but "I'm not telling you that."
There are tons of bad coaches in college (and pros also I bet). But there are a lot of good ones too that work hard furthering their knowledge on player development. I am sure they are thinking about their staff and doing whatever they can to make them successful.

That may be a tough thing to find, and a lot of times you don't know any of this until you're there. But I have to believe they are out there.
This little 3 way ****ing contest is getting old.

So, back to the original topic regarding college pitching coaches. And I will use a player near and dear to my heart as an example. Son plays at a D-1 school that is usually ranked in the top 20. I would say more, but frankly there are some of you that I don't trust.

Last year's pitching coach could be described as old school, but that's not really the best term. I think it would be better to say his approach was a bit dated. Running consisted of lots of distance running, and very little sprinting. Conditioning consisted of a lot of bench, squats, etc. Stuff that you would get from a HS football coach. Kids were taught to throw "doorknob" sliders, with hard supination of the forearm. Terms like pansies and pu$$ies were frequently used. Reporting injuries often provoked a strong negative reaction. After a time most of the kids quit reporting pain at all for fear that they would end up on his S--- list.
Players were discourage from listening to anything that Tom House had to say about pitching.

New coach is night and day different. Running program has been modified to include LOTS of sprint work. Old guy's 180 foot long toss "program" has been replaced with something akin to the Alan Jaeger max out approach. Conditioning has been modified to include more rotational core work. Kids are having evaluations to help determine what they need to work on mechanically and strengthwise.

Players love new coach. Old coach was universally disliked.

Old guy called a great game. Don't know how the new guy will do, or if he'll even call pitches. What will the results be in the spring? I have no idea. But I am thrilled with the new guy.

I should also point out that the old guy had pitched a little at a small DI. I don't think the new guy even pitched in college. But he has obviously busted his butt to educate himself. I'll take a guy like this over a guy that hasn't learned a thing since college ANY DAY.
Yes woody, my son's HC had redeeming qualities. He was a very good recruiter. The JR year P coach had non. He also was generally hated by all the pitchers.. The soph year P coach was a nice guy but admitted he knew very little about pitching. He did try hard to get up to speed and he was well liked.
The freshman P coach was a great P coach. Ran a pitching clinic and had Tom House attend. The SR year PC I think will be good. He also runs a P clinic and hopefully will get things on track
Where P coaches are very important is that they have to recognize mechanical break down. All pitcher have a tendency to stray as do hitters. Pitchers can develop problems which is what happened to my son. He started to drop his elbow down and was separating his arm from his upper body as he tried to leverage more velocity. He went from being a very good pitcher to a terrible pitcher. I corrected the mechanics the summer before his SR year and for a couple weeks he was back on his game but gradually drifted back to some of the issues.
If you look at this link you will see how little if anything assistant coaches are paid if anything at all. Yes there are good P coaches out there but how do you ensure that they will be there for 4 years while your son attends.

http://ope.ed.gov/athletics/In...393a32333a333520414d
.

I didn't make it clear BHD, but I was referring to MTH's situation with my last post.

With that said, I am pleased to read your most recent comments regarding the various coaches your son played for. Where praise is due you have offered it. Where criticism is due you leveled it.

We have been around more than a few coaches who sorely lacked the skills to be successful and more importantly lacked the skills to take their players forward and prepare them well for the next level.

By experiencing that type of coach it really makes a good coach, one who has everything put together, very valuable and tremendously appreciated.

Becoming a good and successful coach is not at all easy, but should always be rewarding! My hat is off to all of those good coaches out there. I know they all worked hard to become the good coach that they are...and they will continue to work hard. Why? Because they love the game!




.
Last edited by gotwood4sale
I tried that and it kept giving me the main page.
The assistant salaries are at the button on the coach salaries.
If you select a college and pull up their data , the coaches salaries are found by clicking on that heading. It tells how many coaches and what their average salaries are. One friend who graduated from my son's college was paid $12000 at a D1 but it was a credit against his MED fees.
quote:
Originally posted by BobbleheadDoll:
I tried that and it kept giving me the main page.
The assistant salaries are at the button on the coach salaries.
If you select a college and pull up their data , the coaches salaries are found by clicking on that heading. It tells how many coaches and what their average salaries are.


So, you don't really have a basis for the comment...

quote:
Originally posted by BobbleheadDoll:
Most college P coaches are not paid. Many of them have little or no pitching knowledge.


correct?

quote:
Originally posted by BobbleheadDoll:
One friend who graduated from my son's college was paid $12000 at a D1 but it was a credit against his MED fees.


This is typical of a volunteer assistant slot, of which, each team is allowed one.
Sooooo. What are the qualities of a good college pitching coach? Is a discipile of the Tom House school of pitching a + or -, or just a starting point to understanding what not to do.

I contend the reason most PC's move around so much is that their looking to become HC's. I would also contend that overuse is brought on by the HC.
I know plenty of players that went to top programs, didn't feel that they were getting what they should in instruction(pitching or hitting) and sought out instruction during the off season, instead of laying blame that they didn't do well because of the coaching staff. Don't some of you do that now for your younger players? You may like the coach a lot, but you may feel that instruction is lacking, so you seek pitching or hitting lessons elsewhere, that doesn't change in college and it doesn't change on the pro level either. It is also the responsibility during recruiting to understand the pitching philosophy of the coach. My son's p coach is a young guy (even younger back then), but his philosophy falls under traditional mechanics. Not sure if you all know of a first rounder who worked under a well known pitching coach, he didn't care for his philosophy or his attitude. I am sure that many of you whose sons have been to college will tell you that they may not have liked every coach they had, but that doesn't mean that you lay blame for business you should have taken care of yourself.

It's gonna be hit or miss wherever you go, and understand that at most programs, there IS a designated paid hitting coach and pitching coach and HC allow them to do their jobs without interference. Some HC are just figure heads that are too busy for instruction, others are their own hitting and pitching coaches, this is where one has to do their homework and who the player will work under. I still don't get the comment about most pitching coaches not getting paid. That may be true in some cases where programs are almost broke.

I can't stand it when people lay blame on coaches, there are alternatives.
This thread seems to be going in circles. IMHO that is because it is very subjective. Whats good for one may not be good for the other?

Anyway, I had a couple of pro scouts tell me the best thing I could help my son do is find him a good PC. So my question to the scouts was; what makes a good PC?

Their answer was "good luck". I said luck should have nothing to do with it. But in the end I believe it does. You do your home work and look for many qualities that you believe will help your son. Like finding one that keeps kids from going under the knife was big on my list.

I guess what I am getting at is that you have to make YOUR list and go in search of the ONE that fits your list. Now I bet we can start putting together a list of attributes that someone could glean items they want to look for. I do believe luck is part of this formula.
Last edited by AL MA 08
There is a lot of luck involved but it is not with the coaches attributes. The luck is about having a good coach who understands the fundamentals and that remains with the school while your son attends for 4 years.
There are several things that are part of good mechanics. The NAPA (Tom House)guide lines are great. Even great mechanics won't keep your son from having arm surgery but it minimizes the risk.
A good PC monitors his pitching staff looking for a break down and signs of fatigue. I watch pitchers who start out throwing well and after a few innings you can see things going down hill. The other thing is that pitchers have trouble recognizing their own issues and need a PC that keeps him on target.
quote:
Originally posted by workinghard:
Ok then, exactly what is the role and/or responsibility of the pitching coach at the collegiate level. Confused


The role of the college pcoach, IMO, should be that he knows each individual player and what he needs to improve to be successful at that particular level he will be playing. The icing on the cake would be one that looks farther beyond the college game and that also would be for each individual player as well. I know my son's coach prepared them the best he could according to each individuals strength. Remember, it also has to do with being a coachable player, to be willing to accept your faults and work on them as instructed. Can't tell you how many times son and his pc went at it because son just didn't want to listen, and he wasn't the only one, but the pcoach's philosophy was you listen to me, I'll make it happen, but you are going to go through lots of tough times for it to happen and most players don't like that. Most players don't like to see their ERA's fall when going through changes and that is why many coaches don't make many changes to players, going though changes can mean a loss or two. So it is not always a bed of roses and hugs and kisses at the end of the day. My son didn't like, in the beginning, being pushed to the limit, but that was how you learned. And I agree that it's important to have a coach who knows his pitchers well enough (and makes it his business) to watch for fatigue and know when to pull the player, and the HC should be in tune to that as well.
I know there has been a lot of going around in circles here but there have been good points made during that. One has to decide what is best for them, it you are looking only for max dollars then you have to take what comes with it, and that may not be the best bb experience, perhaps taking less and working with a better coach, better program may mean more to some than others. These are all personal decisions, but in the end it is the player and family that has to decide what is best, with no whining afterwards.
Many pitchers are not recruited directly by the pitching coach, but it is important that you make it your business to talk to that coach before a decision is made. Because my son had serious aspirations of going pro, that was very important and my husband made it his business to talk to each individual p coach to ask what they liked about son and what they would change and what they would leave alone, if they had to clue he advised son that may not be the right place for him IF this was important to son.
Another suggestion, watch the team ERA, a big indication the pcoach knows what he is doing. Check out innings awarded, there most likely will be 2-3 that have a heavier load, but not be so lopsided that the work load is not spread out.

Yes, it is true that coaches come and go, but that is the HC's responsibility to make sure the replacement is able to do the job for his particualr program, so that is where the HC's experience comes into the picture. If a program has a big turnover of assistant coaches, you might want to look into that further. The problem I see is that players make decisions based upon division, conference, etc. I certainly would hope that my player would prefer a D2,D3 with a good solid staff and program over a floundering D1. Or a smaller program with good stats, good win/loss percentages over a larger one that struggles.


JMO.
Last edited by TPM
Good points TPM. Watching how the Pcoach works with each individual and his ability to deal with different styles, physical attributes of different pitchers, and how to get the most out of each person seems to be more hind sight and difficult to tell up front and is a tall order during the recruiting process. When you are on the outside looking in during the recruiting process this appears to equate to looking at the stats on the teams web page. How they spread the innings/work load and performance and depth of the pitchers.

You have to ask some questions like; what is your conditioning program? do you tailor it to each player or is it general program for all pitchers? how many medical red shirts have you had in your pitching staff and what are some of the medical procedures pitchers have had after being on your training program for a year or longer? These are difficult to ask but answers could be insightful as to how well the PC deals with his pitchers.

BHD, I think you are very lucky if you can put all this together during the recruiting process and land in a program that you get good consistent coaching over 3 or 4 years.

As to the initial question; what is the quality of college pitching coaches? IMO it is generally pretty good. I like the aspect of having a consistant program over the first three years after high school. As BHD points out, the coaches do change and sometimes more than once in a 3 to 4 year time period. As we were looking at different programs one SEC shcool chnaged the entire coaching staff when the program did not turn around quickly. The pitching coach was excellent and one of the reasons we were looking hard. But he went out the door with the head coach. Sometimes doing your homework still does not work.

Soooo, IMO you also need to look at the trainers. The guys that put the guys through the weight room and conditioning program.
Last edited by AL MA 08
You make good points about asking about training, that's why visits are important, make sure that you talk to the training staff as well. Chances are some of them have been around longer than the coaching staff.

FWIW, pcoach told us that most pitchers arrive with injuries from overuse in HS, not hurt in college. I beleive it.
Last edited by TPM
TT,
Do coaches just tell you what you want to hear or do recruits and their parents just listen to what they want to?
Never once did any coach recruiting son make any promises, I did find every coach to be up front and honest with son. Highly recruited out of HS, all told him he had to earn his playing time. Not sure if that was because we knew to ask the right questions or not and what to expect.
For sure I would say a lot coaches are honest and up front. They try to do a good job.

Unfortunately I have experienced the other side of this argument. I have seen poor coaching and have been sold a bill of goods.

I have however seen the good side and can only appreciate even more now, those who do the right thing.

My point is made. The truth. That's all you can hope for.
.
I'll take this a just a little out of the circle...This whole thread only reminds us about the complexity of trying to balance ALL the parts of the recruiting/decision process for most of us.

While some have a dream school opportunity and some have but a single major goal, for most of us this thing is incredibly complex: Division, geography, academics, tuition, baseball $, non baseball $, Head coach, pitching/hitting coach, housing, environment, player development, position opportunity, alumni opportunity, draft many of which you frankly are taking calculated guesses at. For most us us the finaly decision ended/ends up being a guess, a calculated guess, an incredibly complex guess, but a guess.

IMO, the most important part was that in the end it is the player who has to be at peace with the decision...coaches included. As a parent we might have made other choices but it is the player who has to LIVE the decision, and it is his passion and comittment that will get him through whatever tough times, the challenges that he will face...and every player will face tough times and challenges.

Cool 44
.
Totally agree. Our choice was based on our goals. My son is a very happy young man with a sore shoulder he can live with. I have always expressed my surprise with the turn over of players and coaches. This includes many of my friends son's experiences.
We actually had a heads up and that is why we placed location and scholarship at the top of our priorities. In the end my son got a great education at a bargain price and had the best 4 years of his life so far.
Given the high turnover of coaches even at great BB programs,there is an element of risk and guess work.
quote:
Originally posted by Goosegg:
On another thread, it was noted that Chris Handke, a D3 pitcher, was drafted. Chris was 6' 3" and 235 who threw app 10 innings in his draft year hitting between 85 - 88. He was pretty wild in college. After the collegiate season, and very quickly, he raised his velo to 93.

Why didn't he get that velo in college? Since most college players have at least a dream of continuing their baseball careers into pro ball, isnt the quality of pitching coach at least a consideration for a player in choosing a program? What is the quality of pitching coaches in college?


I didn't read every post, didn't want to waste my time I just scanned to see if anybody made the correction to Chris's height, he is 6'11 and he hit 93 once.

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×