Originally Posted by J H:
I'm bowing out of this one, I've argued this way too many times on this site, with numerous scientific examples, proving why the exact opposite of this is true. If someone else would like to run with it, go ahead. Good luck.
I think it's wise to avoid absolute positions in general, and in particular when talking about subjects in this thread. The current movement is away from icing after games. I tend to believe that this is correct and that icing has been overrated and overused. But like most things in baseball and in life, it's situational and individual. No one has THE answer... and no approach is necessarily dead wrong to right. What is "known" to be fact via scientific examples today can become fiction quickly. Nothing has been proven to be true or false on the subject of post game icing... likewise how much and what types of running... Likewise pitch counts. Pitchers threw massive total innings and total pitches every year for decades...did and didn't ice, jogged poles, and enjoyed pre game breakfasts of chipped beef and scotch. For a long period, the belief system swung toward pitchers throwing less and less... so there were years of guys not throwing much and then heating it up and going max effort sporadically at showcases, key games, and such. That never made much sense, but most "experts" cited all the good science supporting this approach to the exclusion of all others. Now prevailing wisdom swings toward throwing more often and at higher intensity. So I think the best approach is to be informed, stay informed, know your player, and learn what is most effective for him. One size rarely fits all.
My son has never liked icing his arm and rarely does so during the summer, though I notice he always ices after pitching HS games, as do all our HS pitchers. Think it might have something to do with getting wrapped up by the trainers while girls are still within eyeshot. Now that's an irrefutable scientific reason for post game icing.