Interesting topic... I've skimmed most replies... Like smokeminside I got a "rise" out of the 3 types of posters comment as I don't fit into any of those categories. I also find the "Random thought" and the (politely) very varying/strong opinions/arguments afterwards to be an interesting paradox. /me thinks this was more than a random thought... If it was random, would the author have kept replying?
Anyway building off of 2019of's last sentence "Failure is in the eyes of the beholder." but keeping in mind some of the discussion that has occurred... If failure is 4 years of D3 baseball at a HA followed by 3 years of UNC Law school to be a lawyer because my son realized early on that being able to continue to play baseball and get a quality education was more important and/or likely than what it takes to get into the MLB, then I'll take that "failure" 7 years out of 7. I can thump my chest over that accolade for a lifetime rather than the few weeks/months at the end of the HS school if my son got a scholly at some D1 school. When he was going through the process - even applying to low level D1's or D2's wasn't an option for him because he felt he needed the HA. So yes, while D3 chose him, he also chose D3 by not pursuing other options. Going to a D1 or D2 would only have been a "status symbol" gesture at best.
When you "see" yourself the difference between the levels (I also had a son play at a D2 school) - it really becomes more apparent that it's important to choose the right level for yourself (both baseball and school). I think that's what quite a few posters have noted here as well (not only in this thread but in many others over my years of mostly reading).
I will note as a parent watching D3 baseball for 4 years, I wondered about a few players along the way - thinking they could have played "higher", but each player and family has reasons for where they are playing. To a degree the sport has chosen where they'll play. If they do well enough at any level, a pro scout will find them.