quote:
Originally posted by getagoodpitchtohit:
quote:
Originally posted by gotwood4sale:
.
I'll just throw
this into the fray.
.
Yeah, surprised this hasn't been talked about much here. ...
It was, by me and several others - about five pages back.
![Wink](/static/images/graemlins/icon_wink.gif)
It's just hard to know what to make of that report. The co-workers who say that the DA in question, Ray Gricar, was not political and wouldn't have backed off from prosecuting anyone, don't quite ring true to me. There was clear evidence of a crime in 1998, even if it was a relatively modest s*x crime (in comparison to the 2002 reports, at least), but the investigation turned up independent evidence of at least two "identical" molestations, a police tape-recorded conversation between a victim's mother and Sandusky in which he admits doing the same thing with many other boys and says he won't stop...yet the investigation just stops. Figuring out HOW many more there were is not pursued, nobody tries to find out if other boys were subjected to more serious abuse, nothing. And then Sandusky abruptly retires. This raises a lot of questions - for the police, for Paterno, for the AD, for Gricar, everybody.
I find more telling the comment at the end of the linked article, when a fellow DA says “You don’t want to go after someone high profile unless you have a compelling case.” Pure speculation, but I'd guess Gricar knew he was dealing with criminal activity, but that it was not a "compelling" enough case and he bought into promises from PSU officials that Sandusky would be dealt with. And perhaps, just perhaps, he later got some inkling of how they had "dealt" with it, and...
His disappearance - especially with (see
here) the news that his county-issued laptop was found with its hard drive missing (later found, but too damaged for anything to be recoverable) and searches on his home computer turned up things like "how to fry a hard drive" and "water damage to a notebook computer" - certainly raises questions about what Gricar or possibly somebody else didn't want to be found on that computer.
Is he dead? If so, was it suicide, or homicide? Who was trying to hide what? In the end, it is all just speculation, and it may or may not have anything to do with the Sandusky case.
Something tells me, though, that the feds will take another crack at his disappearance, and that hard drive.
This case just gets more and more strange. If this was a pitch for a movie script, it would be rejected as too unbelievable. The Gricar plot line would be considered where the script "jumped the shark." The latest Madden rumor? Is there such a thing as "jump the whale?"