I'm thinking Detroit but I'm just hoping they go 7 games.
Original Post
Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by trojan-skipper:
6 teams in the America League won more games than the Tigers. If the White Sox wouldn't have crumbled in the last two weeks the Tigers would be long gone.
And yet... I think the tigers will win it...
quote:Originally posted by zombywoof:
I could care less who wins. Baseball season over and now it's time to focus on the NY Giants defending their Super Bowl title. It's looking like the Giants are the best team in the NFL up to this point so there's a lot to root for with the Giants. Baseball is in the rear view mirror now.
quote:Originally posted by zombywoof: I could care less who wins. Baseball season over and now it's time to focus on the NY Giants defending their Super Bowl title. It's looking like the Giants are the best team in the NFL up to this point so there's a lot to root for with the Giants. Baseball is in the rear view mirror now.
quote:Originally posted by zombywoof:
I could care less who wins. Baseball season over and now it's time to focus on the NY Giants defending their Super Bowl title. It's looking like the Giants are the best team in the NFL up to this point so there's a lot to root for with the Giants. Baseball is in the rear view mirror now.
quote:Originally posted by biggerpapi:
QUOTE]
That's too bad. I actually am probably more happy with a series like this where I have no favorite team in it.
I'm looking for seven awesome games! Tonight's off to a good start.
quote:Originally posted by J H:quote:Originally posted by zombywoof: I could care less who wins. Baseball season over and now it's time to focus on the NY Giants defending their Super Bowl title. It's looking like the Giants are the best team in the NFL up to this point so there's a lot to root for with the Giants. Baseball is in the rear view mirror now.
I actually laughed out loud at this...I assume you are saying it light-heartedly, as any real baseball fan would never actually say something like this.
Baseball season is in its peak. The World Series is the pinnacle of the sport each year. I will be tuned into every pitch of every game.
I think the Tigers will take the series, but the Giants have had an unbelievable run all postseason. It'll sure be fun to watch!
quote:Originally posted by zombywoof:quote:Originally posted by J H:quote:Originally posted by zombywoof: I could care less who wins. Baseball season over and now it's time to focus on the NY Giants defending their Super Bowl title. It's looking like the Giants are the best team in the NFL up to this point so there's a lot to root for with the Giants. Baseball is in the rear view mirror now.
I actually laughed out loud at this...I assume you are saying it light-heartedly, as any real baseball fan would never actually say something like this.
Baseball season is in its peak. The World Series is the pinnacle of the sport each year. I will be tuned into every pitch of every game.
I think the Tigers will take the series, but the Giants have had an unbelievable run all postseason. It'll sure be fun to watch!
As a baseball fan, sure, I'll watch some but with zero rooting interest, it'll be as exciting as watching the news. I'll be changing channels back and forth. Something I never do with a Yankee world series. Sports talk? All Yankees all the time when in the series. But this year, any world series talk and I switch to who's talking NY Giants football.
quote:Just my view but if you are not watching and enjoying Zito compete tonight, you are better off watching football.
I agree you are a fan first. The two teams I follow are not in the WS, but I'm a baseball fan none the less. I'm watching every pitch, every hit, manager moves and doing my best to tune out Buck and McCarver. I'm glad to see Scutaro do so well. I'm cheering for Verlander to do better as he from our neck of the woods (our family paths have crossed many times). It is the freaking World Series, and it will always get my interest as a baseball fan.quote:JH said...I am from the school of thought that you are a baseball fan before you are a fan of a particular team. I guess we're outliers by thinking that way??
quote:Originally posted by biggerpapi:
If Fielder would have slid run and slid outside the baseline, he would have been safe in the first inning.
quote:Originally posted by biggerpapi:
3-0
Wow! Who knew!?!?
quote:biggerpapi asked....3-0Wow! Who knew!?!?
quote:Originally posted by fenwaysouth:quote:biggerpapi asked....3-0Wow! Who knew!?!?
Nobody on this board or anyone I know knew this was going to happen. All of my Giants buddies hedged when they told me the Giants would win in 7.
This has to go down as one of the biggest upsets & chokes (beyond 2004 Yankees!) if the Giants sweep tonight. Unbelieveable. THey won two HUGE playoff games with Barry Zito. Yes, that Barry Zito. Simply unbelieveable. God, I'm sounding like Tim McCarver.
quote:For some reason I get a real rush out of seeing a 5'10" 185 lb 36 year old 2 Baseman with 10 years experience in the show, come up with a huge hit!
quote:Originally posted by biggerpapi:
Does anyone else think Austin Jackson should have tried to make a diving catch on Scutaro's 10th inning single last night?
There's two outs so the runner is going to score no matter what.
I thought he pulled up on a couple of other balls earlier in the series, balls that were higher fly balls that wouldn't have gone far on the ground if he didn't catch them.
quote:But in general, it seemed to me that the Tigers overall played too tentatively. I am no Giants fan, but I really think the Giants play looser than any other team and that is what separated them from the rest.
quote:Originally posted by biggerpapi:
Does anyone else think Austin Jackson should have tried to make a diving catch on Scutaro's 10th inning single last night?
There's two outs so the runner is going to score no matter what.
I thought he pulled up on a couple of other balls earlier in the series, balls that were higher fly balls that wouldn't have gone far on the ground if he didn't catch them.
quote:Originally posted by floridafan:
That is a good point! I thought he pulled up on it too. If he had dove he had a chance to catch the ball and save the game.
I see that a lot, and I do not understand why players that do not dive for balls are playing MLB. It really does bother me when you see players at various levels get serious looks by scouts as they watch balls go up the middle on the ground. They make a faint attempt in show, but will never dive for a ball, yet they are drafted...
This really blows my mind, especially when they are not drafted for their bat, but their glove. What good is a glove if you do not dive for a ball when necessary.
Of course my son dives all over the place and is filthy by the time he leaves a field, so I guess I am biased.
It seems like a totally different mentality at play, and I am mystified why the player that refuses to get dirty gets an opportunity and so many that have the same glove skills, but are also willing to sacrifice their body get overlooked.
If I were a scout, I would weigh heavilly against a player that was willing to let a ball go through the gap when runners are on. To me it is inexcuseable. But it happens all the time.
Buried in scr@ppy is cr@ppy. The automatic editor looks at letter strings, not words.quote:Originally posted by bball123:
Not sure why the word s-c-r-a-p-p-y is not allowed here
quote:Originally posted by RJM:
OK Giants fans. What do you think of this? There are two players on the last year of their contracts. How about trading Lincecum for Ellsbury? The Giants won without Lincecum having a good year. Ellsbury would be very likely to resign with the Giants since he's a west coast guy. This was a suggestion in The Boston Herald.
The other side of the question is how do Red Sox fans feel about this? The article also discussed Lincecum's unique delivery, the mileage on his arm and his down season may be a forebearing of things to come.
quote:Originally posted by TPM:
I found the series to be interesting in that it really showed the differences between how they approach the game. The Tigers offense was built for the long ball for sure. Those big boppers don't bunt.
quote:Originally posted by Truman:
re: Austin Jackson's Center Field Effort:
Do you think it might have something to do with putting yourself at risk for injury???
quote:Austin Jackson's Center Field Effort:
quote:Originally posted by Truman:quote:Originally posted by TPM:
I found the series to be interesting in that it really showed the differences between how they approach the game. The Tigers offense was built for the long ball for sure. Those big boppers don't bunt.
Look at how many teams went after "big boppers" to help them get to the WS and how far did they get. Doesn't that say that there other aspects of the game that are just as important as "big boppers?"
quote:Originally posted by TPM:quote:Originally posted by Truman:quote:Originally posted by TPM:
I found the series to be interesting in that it really showed the differences between how they approach the game. The Tigers offense was built for the long ball for sure. Those big boppers don't bunt.
Look at how many teams went after "big boppers" to help them get to the WS and how far did they get. Doesn't that say that there other aspects of the game that are just as important as "big boppers?"
Did I say that there isn't other aspects of the game. I was just replying that you are not going to see guys bunt that are being paid millions to hit the long ball. When was the last time you saw Albert bunt, Matt Holiday, or Texiera?
That's not the intention when they put together that line up.
quote:OK Giants fans. What do you think of this? There are two players on the last year of their contracts. How about trading Lincecum for Ellsbury? The Giants won without Lincecum having a good year. Ellsbury would be very likely to resign with the Giants since he's a west coast guy. This was a suggestion in The Boston Herald.
quote:The Tigers had a lot of those kinds guys and it's a big part of what got them to the WS. But IMHO I think the team was a little too heavy that way making them, for a lack of a better way to put it, too one dimensional. AND, I think the down time waiting to play in WS was a detriment to those guys rhythm for their hitting. You gotta hand it to the Giants pitching for coming out of their pitching slump just when they needed to, otherwise, it would have been a VERY different story.
quote:Originally posted by Three Bagger:
A lot of it had to do with the fact that the Tigers live and die by the longball and when that stopped or there was no one on when they did hit one they had no other offensive tools. National League teams are better equipped to play the small ball that can come into play in series that feature great pitching and low scoring games because they are used to bunting, pitchers batting, the double switch, and having rosters that are built for that kind of baseball. Sometimes the AL teams can't even use one of their best offensive players due to the DH not being used at times.
Believe me, there are not a ton of teams that want Delmon Young on their roster and just having him in the lineup shows that the Tigers have a weakness that can be exploited. He is a horrendous offensive and defensive player.
quote:That final pitch took some real guts. I am quite a Romo fan after that last inning especially.
quote:That's fine, I'll pull out the "let's agree to disagree" quip.
I believe the players had much more to do with this series than the managers.
quote:Maybe over a season this is correct however Young hit .357 in the WS. The only player on either team even close was Infante at .333.