Skip to main content

quote:
Originally posted by baseballpapa:
The college coach was telling ALL his players to get the foot down early. Early is early, it is no good. It ruins timing and makes everyone a slap hitter. Also makes it hard to drop the barrel (or adjust) for off-speed and location.


My experience tells me the exact opposite.
quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
Had the contact been when his foot was just touching the ball would have been in the upper deck.


1) His foot was down first before he started to swing. This clip does not support what you say. (Neither does the clip in which you say the hitter "slides his foot")

2) You are making a BIG assumption that he would have hit the ball 100+' feet further had he done what you say. That would be over a 25% increase in batspeed and ball distance.

3) If you are advocating someone swinging as the their front foot hits the ground, you are creating guess hitters. Their timing needs to be impeccable to hit the FB and they can't adjust to offspeed pitches.
1 & 2) I agree that since the front foot was down in both clips that neither hit the ball as far as a slightly better swing would have been.

ARod's shot was about 400 feet. Had he made slightly better contact at footfall, he would have hit it five hundred feet.

Previous to the renovation of Yankee Stadium, ARod's ball would have still been in play. A ball had to go in the bleachers for a home run at that time.

Once a ball is over the fence, there are no extra points for distance.

3) This is what slows your swing. Timing for the fastball is what is worked on most. The swing you advocate is slow.

A batter does not read the spin on the ball in the swing. He reads it out of the pitcher's hand. He swings at the spot where he guesses the ball will be after making the adjustment.

You have your batters thinking too much, slowing their ability to react.

The greater one's bat speed, the more time they have to react.
Last edited by Quincy
quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
1 & 2) I agree that since the front foot was down in both clips that neither hit the ball as far as a slightly better swing would have been.

ARod's shot was about 400 feet. Had he made slightly better contact at footfall, he would have hit it five hundred feet.

Previous to the renovation of Yankee Stadium, ARod's ball would have still been in play. A ball had to go in the bleachers for a home run at that time.

Once a ball is over the fence, there are no extra points for distance.

3) This is what slows your swing. Timing for the fastball is what is worked on most. The swing you advocate is slow.

A batter does not read the spin on the ball in the swing. He reads it out of the pitcher's hand. He swings at the spot where he guesses the ball will be after making the adjustment.

You have your batters thinking too much, slowing their ability to react.

The greater one's bat speed, the more time they have to react.


Quincy,

What you advocate and what is done are two totally seperate things. Perhaps you should worry more about clarifying what you see and what big league hitters do rather than what my hitters are doing. I have worked with some pretty decent hitters year in year out.

Again, show me a clip of someone who does what you claim is the uber swing. Heck, at this point, I'd settle for a clip of you doing it. That worked out well for TPG's credibility.

Anyway, let's take this discussion point by point:

1) Show me a hitter who hits your way.

2) What data do you have to support your claim that A-Rod's swing in the clip would have hit the ball 25% further had he swung like you advocate? Is this a random number you are pulling out of your can?

3) I never said the hitter reads the spin. What I said was...you advocate the swing starts before the toe touches. Again, show me a clip of this occurring.
Last edited by redbird5
The theory of the Perfect swing is the ideal. We as humans may strive for that perfection and never attain it.

Those who come closest are the stars.

You may have worked with some pretty good hitters, but I'm sure they don't apply what you teach.

Waiting to adjust for the off speed in the swing is foolish.

You must be wedded so deeply to some school of hitting that you are afraid to try something different.

Take my style of swing to the field and you will then have some basis to critique.

Arguing the tenets of your 'religion of hitting' against any other is close minded. You may find that there is a better, simpler way.
Quincy,

Maybe you are correct, but in about 52-53 years of playing, coaching, scouting, teaching, studying baseball I've never known anyone who would agree with your theory of making contact at the precisely the same time the stride foot lands.

That would require the hips, hands and bat to commit way too early IMO. It would also eliminate good balance and the swing itself (to contact point) would have to be performed with one foot (back foot) only on the ground. All of this together would slow down the bat, and make it nearly impossible to hit anything off speed.

I'm not basing this on anything other than common sense and how every good hitter I've ever seen makes contact.

I agree with the others who ask for a video clip of someone actually doing this. The videos so far only prove the opposite to be true. Including the one of the young kid.

I'm not sure, but I'm guessing a hitter would feel very "uncomfortable" making contact at the same time his stride foot touched.

I'm still having a hard time understanding why you are so insistant about this.

BTW, I don't think everything you have said is wrong, just some of it. And I for one (of many) would welcome you proving your point by showing it in video.

If somehow you are correct, golfers will start lifting their front leg while starting their swing and making contact as their front foot touches the ground to gain that extra 25% on their drives.

Sorry for the stupid comparison, but I just don't know if what you're talking about is even possible in a good swing.

BTW, I consider myself very open minded and have no religon of hitting, throwing or anything else in baseball. I do believe there can be better ways. Just having a hard time with your theory here. Who else teaches this? Could everyone else be wrong?
The main reason that I know that this works is that it has worked for me and anyone willing to try it.

The golf analogy is a good one. The reason golfers don't stride is that they are trying to contact a ball with a flat surface.

Golf is not as forgiving as baseball. Success is not measured by three good shots out of ten.

A golfer using a wood or any long club could get more distance with a stride though not consistent contact or direction.

My 'style' is similar to golf in that I use the bat to get my distance. I keep my hands relaxed and after developing bat speed, ride the swing through contact and follow through.

The problem most people would have is the simplicity of the 'style'.

Once people get out on the field and use the swing, they are amazed at the sharpness of line drives and the distance on long balls.

As I say, the ideal would be contact at toe touch, but any variation close utilizing the principles would get good results with good contact. Baseball pappa would like contact while still moving forward before toe touch.

Many batters today and yesterday use the front foot as a sort of sling shot for the wrist break. I contend that better results can be had eliminating the time it takes to gain this sling shot effect.

The only real way to appreciate what I'm saying is to give it a try. As a golfer, you especially would appreciate the difference.

PS - Sometimes my buddies and I still do the stride at the driving range with the driver just for the distance, even better with the three wood. We call it the 'Happy Goldberg' from the movie.
quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
The main reason that I know that this works is that it has worked for me and anyone willing to try it.

The golf analogy is a good one. The reason golfers don't stride is that they are trying to contact a ball with a flat surface.

Golf is not as forgiving as baseball. Success is not measured by three good shots out of ten.

A golfer using a wood or any long club could get more distance with a stride though not consistent contact or direction.

My 'style' is similar to golf in that I use the bat to get my distance. I keep my hands relaxed and after developing bat speed, ride the swing through contact and follow through.

The problem most people would have is the simplicity of the 'style'.

Once people get out on the field and use the swing, they are amazed at the sharpness of line drives and the distance on long balls.

As I say, the ideal would be contact at toe touch, but any variation close utilizing the principles would get good results with good contact. Baseball pappa would like contact while still moving forward before toe touch.

Many batters today and yesterday use the front foot as a sort of sling shot for the wrist break. I contend that better results can be had eliminating the time it takes to gain this sling shot effect.

The only real way to appreciate what I'm saying is to give it a try. As a golfer, you especially would appreciate the difference.

PS - Sometimes my buddies and I still do the stride at the driving range with the driver just for the distance, even better with the three wood. We call it the 'Happy Goldberg' from the movie.




Okay! I finally figured it out! Quincy is actually Chameleon and he is fishing for sucker fish! Getting lots of action so far.
I will ask again - what does hitting a stationary object - with a golf club - have to do with hitting a 95 MPH fastball that is moving - with a piece of wood?

And when you are waiting for the 95 mph fast ball - and they throw you a 83 MPH offspeed pitch - what does that have to do with hitting a stationary object with a golf club?

Last time I watched golf - the ball didnt move - and the tee didnt change heights in the middle of your swing.
Last edited by itsinthegame
If your goal with this swing is to create batspeed capable of seeing the ball longer why in the world would you want to start so early that you make contact as the front foot is landing? This whole thread is comical. Hitters are only sucessfull 3 out of 10 times Quincy because there are 9 guys out there making plays. With this swing you wouldnt need that many thats for sure. The swing is typically launced as the lead foot lands. This is a timing device. What you describe as the perfect swing is the perfect lunge. Why am I doing this? I should know better.
Wow! Basic? Batspeed is how fast you can take the bat to the ball. When your brain says swing how fast can you take the bat to the ball. Adjustments to the flight of the ball? You start the swing and then you adjust to the flight of the ball? Who do you teach? Name some kids you have instructed. Where do they play? In the middle of your swing you adjust it to the flight of the ball? And then make that contact right as the front foot is landing. Outstanding Quincy. Just when you think you have heard it all you it gets even better.
Coach give it a try.

There is no lunge.

You don't swing at the pitcher's movement you swing at the ball that you see.

You have some preconcieved notion that is blocking you from understanding.

It is a compact and effective swing.

Pick up a bat and try it in a cage.

After doing so, then your critique will be based on something other than surmise.

Even you have to admit that there is something in your style of teaching and coaching that is not the best. If it were, you would have some state championships under your belt.

Realizing that there is room for improvement is the first step in improving.
Last edited by Quincy
quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
The theory of the Perfect swing is the ideal. We as humans may strive for that perfection and never attain it.

Those who come closest are the stars.

You may have worked with some pretty good hitters, but I'm sure they don't apply what you teach.


Are you so close minded as to think that I HAVEN'T worked with stars? They all employ the basics that we work on.

quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
Waiting to adjust for the off speed in the swing is foolish.


Yeah...you are right. Please show me just one hitter who does what you say. You sure do dodge this request pretty deftly.
Many batting coaches have worked 'around' stars, but it is stil the natural ability of that star that produces the stardom.

Batting coaches try to take credit for something that they have no part in.

I'm not closed minded at all. I have tried the mechanics of the various styles, but have found this one most successful and easiest to convey.


I don't have to make this approach any more complicated than it is. No theoretical physics or anatomical analysis of the body in the stance, load and swing.

Rather than seeing someone else swing, pick up a bat and give it a try.

Not having a video clip or animation of the swing is not dodging. I have given you the steps. I can't swing the bat for you.

Watch Ankiel swing. He generates bat speed at the start and lets the bat do the work. Even losing his balance as he did yesterday, he was able to generate enough power to hit a home run.
quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
Many batting coaches have worked 'around' stars, but it is stil the natural ability of that star that produces the stardom.

Batting coaches try to take credit for something that they have no part in.

I'm not closed minded at all. I have tried the mechanics of the various styles, but have found this one most successful and easiest to convey.


I don't have to make this approach any more complicated than it is. No theoretical physics or anatomical analysis of the body in the stance, load and swing.

Rather than seeing someone else swing, pick up a bat and give it a try.

Not having a video clip or animation of the swing is not dodging. I have given you the steps. I can't swing the bat for you.

Watch Ankiel swing. He generates bat speed at the start and lets the bat do the work. Even losing his balance as he did yesterday, he was able to generate enough power to hit a home run.




So you are saying Ankiel does what you say?
quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
Babe Ruth said that a baseball swing should be similar to a golf swing, plus the stride.

I'll take his opinion on the topic over anyone else's.

He does so in this film.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pEYSb66ndNY




Quincy,

Might want to watch that video of his golf swing again and see if he makes contact with his front heel off the ground. The heel planting triggers the forward motion. If he hit with his front heel off the ground, he could have one of the girls pick it up off of the ladies' tee for him.
quote:
Originally posted by Quincy:
What he does is in the same style.

He has room to improve, but the steps are there.

Quibbling over the perfection of the style as it pertains to the front foot is nitpicking.

.




ANY swing has to be put in motion with both feet on the ground to create ANY MEANINGFUL batspeed. I get the "relaxed swing" part, but you are killing it by saying "contact at foot plant!" Foot plant at go, I agree with and THAT is maximizing your swing, but ALL hitters get fooled at times and the key to still being able to make contact is keeping your hands and weight back as long as possible to allow for adjustments.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Quincy:
Many batting coaches have worked 'around' stars, but it is stil the natural ability of that star that produces the stardom.

Batting coaches try to take credit for something that they have no part in. [\QUOTE]

Wrong again. I worked with these kids when they were growing up. I was one of many who helped them through different things. I haven't taken ANY credit for their success...that is why I didn't name drop. You know what they say when you ASSUME?

Batting coaches? Batmanship? Have you ever been around the game other than your keyboard?
Last edited by redbird5
Red,

I made a statement in the general regard. I never said you or named names. No assumption on my part.

Mic,

We both agree with generating power at the start. Where we differ is in that a slight foot lift or stride added to the hip rotation in conjunction with the wrist whip will generate power through the swing.

The 'power swing' that you are speaking of is the sling shot effect or catapult effect caused by the front foot planting. I remove that step quickening the swing. I have found that it isn't necessary in order to get through the 'wrist break' portion of the swing.

I have always recommended that a person be ready to swing fastball on every pitch. Seeing the spin on the pitch other than fastball allows time to adjust before swinging. If in reality a batter adjusts his swing while the swing is in motion little power would be generated and bat speed would diminish.

The faster bat speed allows a batter to be fooled but still effectively adjust before swinging.

The style I am speaking of takes less steps to accomplish and maybe half the time of the swing that you are mentioning. I have used both, but the results of this swing are far greater.

Seeing is believing so like other people, give it a try.

Listen to the people's reactions in the clip I posted of the high school kid's homer. The effects are greater than his usual when he used this swing.

It's really simple mechanics.

.
Very interesting thread.

And while I use different words and may not agree with every detail of Quincy's description, I believe I "feel" what he feels.

Here is a great example of two of the best ever...."swinging before the foot gets down".



I wouldn't go as far to say contact is at touchdown.....but I know what he means. There is a large difference between "feel" and "looks". What a hitter feels compared to how it looks on video.

I would say....the launch of their swing puts their foot down. The foot isn't down first...then swing. And, the swing is so quick that "feel" wise it feels almost simutaneous.

And....if you want to be successful....you better be teaching feel....because that is what the hitter must deal with "in the box".

Notice neither of these two hitters use the Epstein "toe touch to heel drop" to launch their hips. Their hips launch as soon as they pick up their stride foot. Rotation begins at that moment. It is NOT a "firing" of the hip. There is NOT a defined moment of aggressive hip turn. There IS a stretching that occurs as they open the hips. There is a crescendo of the hip turn....that stretches and stretches and stretches...until it's so tight that the hitter must release. This stretching is countered by the upper body which has a "hold" on the system. A hold that in fact is going rearward as they turn the barrel rearward. While the "hold" is in effect...the stretching gets tighter and tighter. And when the hitter finally says "go"...the stretch is released and the bat is whipped through the zone. This IS the mechanical advantage that the highest level swingers use.

A great example would be if a hitter had a bungee cord on his wrists and someone was behind him holding the other bungee cord end. At the moment just BEFORE "go"...if the "holder" released the cord you would have two different results depending on the mechanics they use. In the toe touch/heel droppers...the don't swing until the front foot is down hitters....the cord would simply drop toward the ground with a slight forward movement. That hitter has tightened the bungee cord just to remove slack and he's waiting for "go" to accelerate the bat and thereby create a large pull on the cord.....he's waiting to "fire" the hips....he's waiting to apply his brute force rotation. The extent of his "slack removal prior to swinging" is limited to just making the bungee cord taught...tight. He doesn't keep stretching it beyond that.

In the highest level swingers....when the holder releases the bungee cord....remember I'm speaking of the moment BEFORE "go"....the cord would be aggressively yanked forward because of the stretch that the highest level hitters have going on BEFORE launch.

Their launch more resembles a release (although there is a WAY to do that optimally) than it does a sudden application of force to move the barrel.

Now...what does the video show? It will show what appears to be the "sudden application of force" as if brute strength rotation is being applied. I maintain that is nonsense. It is WAY too slow developing. What is happening is a sudden speed up of the body but only because the hold has been released.

And Quincy's experience of taking a young hitter and teaching this process and seeing an immediate difference mirrors my experience. The kid is not suddenly stronger. His vision didn't suddenly get better. But, he did suddenly get a mechanical advantage. The "stretch and fire" mechanics and their differences (to what most believe occurs) was first taught to me by Donny Buster....Swingbuster.....an often misunderstood hitting genius.

All other attempts to swing with what I call "brute force rotation" are suboptimal. You can find mlb players that do that. Several of them. Some of them quite good. But that speaks to their athletic ability....not their mechanics.

The very best use the highest level mechanics. And I believe Quincy is doing a fairly good job of describing them.

And he is absolutely right when he says...."get in the box and try it".

Most of you have never experienced what he's describing. And, until you do, you're short changing yourself.

P.S. PGStaff......have your sons been taught to put their stride foot down first when pitching and then drop the heel and rotate? I think not. There is a definite rotation into footplant. The hitting move is identical........and the upper body's control over it.....over the release of it....at precisely the right moment....is how the great hitters deal with all the different pitch speeds, directions, and locations. Their swing launch is instantaneous. It simply has to be. And this hips opening creating stretch that is controlled by the upper body until release is the ONLY way to do it optimally.

Waiting for touchdown to drop the heel so as to do all that has to be done in .2 seconds AND cover the zone is what all you nay sayers are asking.

And it is simply impossible to do.
Last edited by Chameleon
I have not interjected in what Quincy has been saying because I wanted to hear what others thought about what he is saying........

It seems all but Chameleon think Quincy is far off the mark of what really happens in the MLB swing....

Well, I, also believe there is some truth to his message.......

There is something called "intent to swing" which comes into play......The front foot works off of this intent, IMO..........

FWIW, I believe this is a vastly misunderstood area of high level swinging that should be explored by everyone interested in this stuff....
Last edited by BlueDog

Add Reply

×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×