No! Don't Call Bunt! posted:Ok, I think I am following your logic better. Your point is that bec the coach is not playing to win and that JV is a "development team/league", then it's no different from you or your son making decisions that is best for himself but not for the team.
I think you are wrongly and incorrectly equating that "not playing to win" is the same as "not doing what's best for the team". The coach may make decisions that may not put the team in the best position to win now, but will develop the team for success later on (maybe later on in the JV season or maybe even for the varsity season). But whatever he is doing is still what's best for the team. Within the context of what the coach is trying to do, all of the players should be doing whatever they can do that is best for the team, not for themselves. Even if the coach is not playing to win that game, when you are at 3-1 count at the bottom of the lineup with the chance to turn the lineup over, you take the walk. Even you have already acknowledge (a few pages ago) that the walk is what's best for the team.
Now, when it comes to showcase baseball, not sure how that works. The point of showcasing is to show individual's skill set. Would the decision, considerations and expectations be different then?
hmmm...the parallel is less about "playing to win" and more about player development. Was the best opportunity for the player to develop to practice putting that ball in play on a 3-1 strike with runners in scoring position. Training him to produce RBI. Even if it was an out it had a good chance of bringing in the run or was the player best developed by standing there and doing nothing...
I think the player was best developed taking a pitch that was, in your words, "borderline". Learning the strike zone, and laying off pitches that are borderline, or hard to handle is a heck of a lot more than "just standing there doing nothing".