Skip to main content

now BlueDog...really..how do you measure the hips a few frames ahead of the shoulders then. I know your not that pure Ny-man.

OBTW...did he add something to posture connect rotate like SEND THE BAT BARREL BACKWARDS. Has that been there or did he just learn it was a big part of the MLB swing. He sure said it. Maybe he was afraid people were realizing it really was important and he was afraid we would think Mankin reported it OVER AND OVER AND OVER

He posted it as he fired Steve on set-pro and chastized and disowned Mark H.

"In hitting, torque is a fallacy"

Epstein spoke by invitation to the 3500 members of the ABCA as the keynote speaker on this chosen subject.

You, Linear, against 3500 ABCA members and a guy that played college, pro ball and teaches lectures, writes for Collegiate Baseball, Certifies coaches, ....people fly from all over the worlds to seee him and has sold 50,000 DVDs and as many or more hitting books. He has made taching his life's mission.

these are the kind of statements that lost Ny-mans credability...Why follow that. NO torque...spinning is good, close off the lead foot, two stage teaching, ....weak and incorrect stuff..we ain't playing fastpitch here

And what have any of us done close to EPSTEIN..you go first
Last edited by swingbuster
Guys_Guys

Sorry I'm in the middle of this volitale situation and apologize because I can tell you guys do mean business and I definitely don't want to get caught in the cross-fire. ITS wasn't kidding.

I have no horse with loaded saddle-bags in this race. Simply want to discuss hitting.

Definitely been away tooo longgg...

Sincerely,
Shep-unloading now-lol
How about some other nymanisms for starters:

Arm strength doesn't matter

Top hand is along for the ride

There is no such thing as tht, just a torqu ing force applied to the bat by back arm inertia that greatly quickens the swing

or some he thought he had to revise:

upper and lower body are separate motor programs

Griffey has the best swing

scap loading isn't that important in hitting

others?
Last edited by tom.guerry
Linear, all I am saying is maybe being just a slight bit earlier on your load. I am not saying to get your foot down while the pitcher is holding the ball or anything. Listen if you are just getting your foot down when the ball is crossing the plate, then you have absolutely no lower stability to hit the ball with any power. Atleast getting into a hitting position a slight bit earlier - will give you a more stable lower half. I cannot see how anyone would disagree with this. Michael Young (Rangers) bought into this and became a hitting leader. Hank Blaylock did not and had a very subpar season. Again all I am talking about is a very slight adjustment.

Re: pitchers trying to mess up your timing. This is nothing new - the good ones do a good job in this area. This is why a batter has to have a CONSISTENT timing approach - no matter what the pitcher is doing. You cannot come up with a different timing mechanism for every pitcher. You have to have a consistent approach - no matter what the pitcher is doing.

Getting into a hitting position slightly earlier, etc. helps you slow the ball down and I believe helps you see the ball better.

Again we are not talking extremes in this case. Just a slight and more consistent approach to timing.
quote:
Originally posted by swingbuster:
quote:
Sorry, but there is no such thing as "shoulders loaded". Either loading or unloading.


I have a picture here of Hank Aaron he looks like he is ready to hit. Are they loading /unloading or loaded.

*****......... *****


"I have a picture of Hank Aaron....."


This folks is living proof if you needed more than what he's already given.
quote:
..And what have any of us done close to EPSTEIN..you go first


I guess this means you believe in the fence drill.

I guess you believe in elbow slotting.

I guess you believe in ALL your weight remaining over the back leg.

I guess you believe the rear elbow can lead the rear hand.

I guess you believe in drop and tilt.

I guess you believe in weathervaning for God's sake.

He's almost as much of a quack as Mike Marshall. Not quite, but close.
Last edited by Linear
New Ny-man quote "posture, connect, rotate, get the barrel going backwards"

At what point did your egomaniancal guru get some new religion. It is now a simple FOUR step process. He invented plagarism.

He and Engishbey fighting over the rights to three words and then boom...there comes the fourth phrase.

Did he finally see hand torque....took him 4 years after Mankin described it. Quick learner

THe tee drill Steve is doing on the "mother of all pathetic post".... I assume is teaching connection. If you taught it any later you would hit the ball into the catcher.

I guess if spinning is your swing you better get used to a very late connection
Last edited by swingbuster
Teacherman-

You have definitely got the dogma down.

A few more protestations of faith like that and you may get out of the doghouse.

I hear they have some openings over at the scientific site.

You can help perfect the no arm action/no torque fastpitch swing.
Trouble is it might not be best there except maybe in the mens game.

At least Epstein and Lau are describing the actual high level baseball swing.

I don't think you create the baseball swing from the middle out, you have to work the ends of the body against each other(thigh/hips vs arms/scaps).

But maybe I'm not scientistic enough as they say on the Colbert Report.
quote:
Originally posted by swingbuster:
New Ny-man quote "posture, connect, rotate, get the barrel going backwards"...


Misquoting people is swingbusters main artillery. His mechanics won't stand up so he misquotes others. 3 or 4 examples of it in this thread alone.

And, he loves to air others dirty laundry.....helps detract from the holes in his hitting theory.

Keep those arms moving, Swingbuster. Let me know when you want them to connect.
Last edited by Linear
quote:
Originally posted by tom.guerry:

At least Epstein...is describing the actual high level baseball swing.



Right, Tom. Now, visit his site and look at the good swing examples he posts. Better yet, tell us right here, have you ever seen a mlb hitter that looked like this guy????

These are examples of "his work".

When is the last time you saw a mlb hitter fall back toward the catcher when he swings?





I know this is a still picture. I'm not computer smart enough to get his .gifs to work here. Go to http://www.mikeepsteinhitting.com and play the .gifs. Your only conclusion can be.......QUACK.

Yet, he's Tom's boy.
Last edited by Linear
That was a very good illustration of a "young" hitter who is well on his way. Definitely hitting against a firm/rigid front side.

Reminds me of a early pictures of Tiger Woods Wink

P.S.(That rocking back motion must be attributed to the paint roller at the end of the extension not seen in picture; reminds me of how I used to rock back when swinging a rake when I was about that age and how I would rock back-lol Is it a paint roller or rake?)

Shep
posture connect rotate.......oops and get the bat barrel going back .........if you know how.

Working top half against the bottom defines how the middle works. THere is no other way to work the middle.

***** did not know how to work the top half back .... he should have listened to Mankin about the top and Epstein about the bottom simply taken credit for the end result
quote:
Does the swing have to be so scientific?==why not just show them?

Young players do not understand the terms used anyway

Isn't it better to be "one on one" and show them what you mean without all the misunderstood terms ???---

TRhit


Definately one on one is the best way to go. As Cal and Billy Ripkin say, "celebrate the individual." And as I mentioned before, I thinks it's best to throw some specific science stuff as well as some simple non-science stuff when teaching the hitter.
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×