Originally Posted by BaseballInstructor50:
…However, in this case. The proof is in the pudding. Several players have moved on to play highs school, college and professional baseball….
BBI,
Mebbi I’m wrong here, but I suspect at least some of the folks aren’t seeing your proof as proof of anything. I.e., what evidence is there that your program is what caused those players to move up? It like the old argument that Mike Marshal never had students make it to the ML so he must not know what he was talking about, ignoring the fact that the vast majority of his students weren’t among the very best when he got his hands on them, many had already been injured, and many were past their prime. There are a lot of people who literally hate MM, and he not only had a fantastic ML career, he earned a PhD in Kinesiology and worked in the field for many many years. So why do you think people would treat you much better?
Were these students of yours who made it to the next level the best or worst players among their peers? I suspect they were among the best, which means they had a big advantage in both talent and opportunity, and whether or not they followed your program or someone else’s, they would go on to higher levels.
It’s really too bad there’s no way to resolve this “disagreement”. The only way to do that would be to track some players who never changed programs, then compare them to see how high they advanced, or to try to figure out where every one of your students ranked against their peers before they began on your program, then track whether or not their position improved or declined once they got on your program. But even then, there wouldn’t be any way to know if they might have done better or worse following someone else’s program. IOW, right now its really not possible to say for sure one way or the other.
So what’s happening is, people are looking at what’s currently known as the leading edge in knowledge on this issue, but not only are you arguing something different, you don’t seem willing to accept what others who are far more expert in these things are saying, or to look at why they are saying it. But I sure don’t fault you for trying. I fault you for faulty logic and reasoning, but think your wanting to help players is a laudable thing to do and hope you continue trying.
One final thought. Something I learned from one of the best pitching coaches in the ML, “Red” Adams, is that no “program” works equally well or everyone, because everyone’s different. He’d have some of his pitchers run, but have others do something else. Another great pitching coach, when asked about running for pitchers, Leo Mazzone is reported to have said, “I think pitchers running is great, but not when they’re wearing an Atlanta Braves uniform.” Their time would be much better spent in the bullpen working on improving their pitching.”
Now that doesn’t mean those guys are right by any means, but it does go to show that there are many way to skin a cat.